come now SS.....he's not all that bad!Yea, quite irrationally sometimes I admit. But can't stand him.
come now SS.....he's not all that bad!Yea, quite irrationally sometimes I admit. But can't stand him.
Move on to where?Or, admit that he is crap and move on.
Oh, yeah, obviously, but Saqlain took one too.I was trying to point out Kumble's 10-fer.
By the time Kumble retires, Chawla might be ahead of him. In fact, some would argue that Powar is already ahead of him.Move on to where?
Is there anyone better?
Honestly, that's an amazing attitude.
In the past three seasons, he has 95 wickets from 20 first-class matches @ 24 apiece in the domestic circuit. Certainly arguable.Richard said:Powar > Harbhajan in the longer game?
Indeed. Unlike SS, I rate Bhajji rather highly. Chawla-Bhajji might be the pair two years from now, while Powar doesn't seem likely to get a break for some reason.Richard said:Sure, Chawla might be good one day but he's 18 years old at the moment. Kumble should have a good couple of years in him but a good proper "Indian" pitch requires 2 spinners. Kumble and Harbhajan have hardly been the worse twosome.
In the past three seasons, he has 95 wickets from 20 tests @ 24 apiece in the domestic circuit. Certainly arguable.
Perhaps because Bhajji and Powar are both better than Ojha?Why not pick Pragyan Ojha, the young left arm wrist spinner over both Harby and Powar in tests ?
Really? I thought he was an orthdox one myself...
(Yeah, yeah )
Cricinfo says he's left arm slow. Cricket Archive says he's left arm orthodox.
And having faced him, he's left arm orthodox.
Cricinfo says he's left arm slow. Cricket Archive says he's left arm orthodox.
And having faced him, he's left arm orthodox.
Given Jack has faced him, I'd back his judgement over any of your references, TBPH...Oh yeah Jack....I forgot, you guys got out to him and Chawla in that u-19 game in Delhi yeah.....
I could be mistaken about him being chinaman....I haven't seen him but as I said, there are lots of references about him as a chinaman.