Steady on. He's a good 30+ balls of that.That innings was the fastest hundred in ODI history.
Don't you find Clarke ugly to watch when he gets in slog mode?Although Matthew Hayden's was the better innings and will likely be judged so, I have to say that I enjoyed watching Michael Clarke bat far more than I did with Hayden.
<30 actuallySteady on. He's a good 30+ balls of that.
Not particularly, not as ugly as Hayden standing there and thumping the ball repeatedly over mid-on/midwicket. I think it's more entertaining to watch Clarke step away slightly and smote it over cover.Don't you find Clarke ugly to watch when he gets in slog mode?
Two didn't either.One did not see Imran Nazir's and Chanderpaul's innings
The funny thing about that is that I initially had "fastest ODI hundred in World Cup history" then realized that that would be redundant. So in editing it I meant to just take out the "ODI" bit and I suppose somewhere along the line I took out the "World Cup" bit instead. Possibly my worst typo on here, if only because of the thought that went into it.Steady on. He's a good 30+ balls of that.