Yeah exactly. How many times do teams chase 300 plus successfully.Oooh. Half a chance there? Nope, on replay it was just over the fielder.
Pitch looks soooo flat. Why would you bowl on it?
I reckon a few captains would have. Given the perception that Australia struggle defending big totals, and that the ball has been moving around in the morning. Don't think the theory about Australia has quite as much too it as some do, but the other point is fair enough. Batting might be even easier later. Not that it'll matter if Australia make 400...Oooh. Half a chance there? Nope, on replay it was just over the fielder.
Pitch looks soooo flat. Why would you bowl on it?
Pretty rigid thinking from Fat Gray then, if that was his thought process. The sun has baked out whatever life the pitch had in it as far as I can see.I reckon a few captains would have. Given the perception that Australia struggle defending big totals, and that the ball has been moving around in the morning. Don't think the theory about Australia has quite as much too it as some do, but the other point is fair enough. Batting might be even easier later. Not that it'll matter if Australia make 400...
Yeah, Ntini's not fully fit IMO. Wasn't at his peak pacewise in the last game either. Langeveldt to come instead of Nel too. Not so much menace in this attack, suddenly.Pretty rigid thinking from Fat Gray then, if that was his thought process. The sun has baked out whatever life the pitch had in it as far as I can see.
Ntini seems to be quite down on pace if the speed gun is to be believed.
cricinfo said:Sam: "So Australia are ontrack for a score of 500. Is that enough to beat S.A this time?" Ah.
cricinfo said:Kym takes the challenge up. "if the aussies get 500 and lose, i will jump ship and follow england!!"