Archived [10/08/07] Battrick

[AussieDominance]

End of Over 20: 85-2, runrate=4.25, reqrunrate=4.03 (205-10)
Spring 5-1-17-1
Paris* 20 (37 balls)
Pollard 0 (6 balls)

Last Wicket: Coates c & b. Spring 40 (FOW: 81/2)

Should do it comfortably from here bar a minor miracle from there Superb/Superb allrounder Spring who the pitch is tailor made for. Coates got out to him just got to block out his last 5.

 

[Dead Badger]

Scaly?

We are Scaly, and we are legion.

 

[Jamee999]

Mr Mahindinho, can you choose to bat first so that we have a game of more than an hour please

 

[AussieDominance]

Mr Mahindinho, can you choose to bat first so that we have a game of more than an hour please

Reed and Sandwidth won't let me

End of Over 34: 159-2, runrate=4.68, reqrunrate=2.94 (205-10)
Spring 7-1-24-1
Pollard* 33 (40 balls)
Paris 55 (88 balls)

Last Wicket: Coates c & b. Spring 40 (FOW: 81/2)

Crusing here although Paris is bizarrely going so slowly normally is doing a bit better than this against teams like this who are barely worth playing .

 

[chaminda_00]

Im getting pretty good at this bot bashing:

White Knights 51 All Out Priyantha 3/17(5), Sishayi 3/11(3.3), Sisk 2/9(4), Jeithoon 2/10(5)

lost to

Jaffna Jets 0/55 Clayton 33(25), Lucas 21(26)

Ratings were Proficient/Competent Batting and Respectable/Respectable Bowling on PAN. Very happy with the Respectable spin rating and first time i've got a Respectable seam rating without a full strengh pace attack. I played PAN as this team beat the team coming 2nd and i needed a NRR pick me up. Im playing a similar bot next week, better batting but worse bowling. I might go TIE and playing a full strength pace attack.

 

[Adamc]

Opened with Whitehorne on a dusty:

End of Over 6: 22-4, runrate=3.67
Whitehorne 3-0-8-3
Summers* 11 (12 balls)
Lund 0 (1 balls)
Last Wicket: Mcgreal c. Ashton b. Whitehorne 0 (FOW: 22/4)

Probably end up having to chase 130 with Summers 100*.

 

[Mahindinho]

Mr Mahindinho, can you choose to bat first so that we have a game of more than an hour please

Heh, will do!

You'll get a nice flat pitch, BTW, with Reed and Sandwith dropped down to the middle order...probably 5 and 6.

Bowling-wise, Hirst will get a rest, and I'll probably open with Brooker (FM) and John (Sp), with Gibb (FM) set v.def and some muppet* to follow, with Verma (F) on as the fifth bowler. Something like that, anyway.

* Youth from a week or two ago. Only pulled for friendlies -- can't remember his name or what he's like!

In today's match, I chased down 144 comfortably -- Perry and Hayward, my cannon fodder-ish openers, lasted for bloody ages before slowing right down (they've got bobbins stamina) and getting out, allowing Reed to come in and blast 38 from 29 balls.

31614 attendance is nice, with ratings...oh bugger, the load has caused my phone to crash. I can't be arsed to reboot it just yet. I'm sure the ratings are pretty, anyway

 

[Adamc]

Hmm, Watkins got Summers for 13, turning into a bit of a rout now.

End of Over 10: 29-6, runrate=2.90
Whitehorne 5-0-13-4
Swift* 1 (3 balls)
Little 0 (5 balls)
Last Wicket: Lund c & b. Whitehorne 4 (FOW: 28/6)

 

[Scaly piscine]

Scaly Piscine CC v Mumbai Maestro (977338) 

Date: 09/03/2007 Ground: Scaly Piscine CG 
Pitch: Flat  Weather: Sunny  
 
Scaly Piscine CC won the toss and elected to bat. 
First Innings of: Scaly Piscine CC (play as normal)  
Name                                     R   B 4s 6s 
Packer                 lbw  b. Osborn  109 124 10 1 
Wheat          st. Kopano   b. Betsy   128 139  8 0 
Armstrong (+)          not  out         48  33  6 0 
Obrien                 not  out         12   6  2 0 
Dillon        
Preece        
Tawanda        
Appleby        
Pace (*)       
Summers        
Tynan        
Extras (2b, 0lb, 0w, 2nb)                4  
Total (50.0 overs, 2 wickets)          301  
 
FOW          1   2  
Total       211 281         
Batsman Out  1   2         
 
Name        O M  R W nb wd 
Burgess    10 0 73 0  0  0 
Betsy      10 0 82 1  0  0 
Osborn     10 0 63 1  1  0 
Kingsberry 10 1 35 0  1  0 
Person     10 0 46 0  0  0 

First Innings of: Mumbai Maestro  
Name                                     R   B 4s 6s
Mcgreal        c. Preece    b. Summers  12  14  0 0 
Van der merwe  c. Preece    b. Summers   3  13  0 0 
Macdonald              run  out          8  11  1 0 
Daniel (*)                  b. Preece   57  73  7 0 
Carstens              c. &  b. Summers   6   8  1 0 
Kopano (+)             lbw  b. Summers  47  58  3 1 
Osborn         c. Armstrong b. Dillon    1   3  0 0 
Burgess                     b. Dillon    0   2  0 0 
Kingsberry     c. Armstrong b. Summers   1   3  0 0 
Betsy                  not  out          4   5  1 0 
Person                 lbw  b. Tynan     1   4  0 0 
Extras (2b, 0lb, 0w, 0nb)                2  
Total (32.2 overs, 10 wickets)         142  
 
FOW          1  2  3  4  5   6   7   8   9   10 
Total       10 19 23 36 128 129 129 132 141 142 
Batsman Out  2  1  3  5  6   7   8   9   4   11 

Name     O M  R W nb wd 
Pace     5 0 29 0  0  0 
Summers 10 2 19 5  0  0 
Tynan  6.2 0 45 1  0  0 
Preece   6 0 34 1  0  0 
Dillon   5 0 13 2  0  0 




         Scaly Piscine CC  Mumbai Maestro 
Top Order:    quality      strong 
Middle Order: strong       competent 
Lower Order:  abysmal      abysmal 
Seam Bowling: exceptional  superb 
Spin Bowling: superb       respectable 
Fielding:     mediocre     mediocre 
 
MOTM: Wheat

Surprised by my seam bowling rating, it only increased to wonderful a few games ago and only one seamer is receiving training. I'm more expecting my top order to pop because it has been on quality for ages and two of three are being trained.

 

[Mahindinho]

Surprised by my seam bowling rating, it only increased to wonderful a few games ago and only one seamer is receiving training. I'm more expecting my top order to pop because it has been on quality for ages and two of three are being trained.

Nice ratings -- I'd still take ya, though

*sacrifices yet another chicken to Bastardeus, the god of BT collapses*

Didn't the increase to Wonderful coincide with you buying that überbowler? If so, maybe he put it straight to high Wonderful.

My seam bowling has been Quality for absolutely ages, despite all four seamers getting trained (only three now, but that's relatively recent). Grrrr.

 

[Adamc]

What levels are your seamers at Mahindinho? I've been getting quality seam with remarkable/exquisite, wonderful/prof, superb/resp and strong/med. The last three are all very close to popping though.

Bowled them out for 44, Crawford and Baird sharing the last four wickets. Might open with Whitehorne more often until Crawford is a bit better developed.

 

[AussieDominance]

Won comfortably. First PAN Proficient Top Order.

Portreath v Pup (992234) 

Date: 09/03/2007 Ground: Portreath CG 
Pitch: Dusty  Weather: Partially Cloudy and Humid 
 
Portreath won the toss and elected to bat. 
First Innings of: Portreath  
Name                                R  B 4s 6s 
Youngs   c. Colley  b. Street       1  3  0 0 
Dann                b. Street      29 19  3 1 
Ford     c. Coates  b. Street      30 29  3 1 
Carsley  c. Coates  b. Mee          3 17  0 0 
Spring   c. Coates  b. Mee         20 19  1 1 
Mensing             b. Mee         51 75  2 2 
Tranter  c. Coates  b. Hinshelwood  7 12  1 0 
Halliday (*)(+)  not  out          41 68  3 0 
Gayle    c. Pollard b. Colley       9 32  1 0 
Alleyne             b. Colley 	    1  2  0 0 
Douglas  c. Coates  b. Colley       0  9  0 0 
Extras (3b, 2lb, 2w, 6nb)          13  
Total (46.3 overs, 10 wickets)    205  
 
FOW         1  2  3  4  5  6   7   8   9   10 
Total       2 44 65 65 99 126 170 200 204 205 
Batsman Out 1  2  3  4  5  7   6   9   10  11 
 
Name         O M  R W nb wd 
Street       8 2 24 3  1  0 
Colley     8.3 0 53 3  1  1 
Mee         10 1 42 3  0  1 
Verhoeven   10 0 40 0  3  0 
Hinshelwood 10 2 41 1  1  0 

First Innings of: Pup  
Name                              R   B 4s 6s
Coates (*)(+)  c. &  b. Spring   40  52  2 1 
Findlay              b. Alleyne  25  25  2 1 
Paris                b. Gayle    69 110  5 0 
Pollard         not  out         52  70  2 1 
Jefferson       not  out         15  10  2 0 
Nevin        
Hinshelwood        
Colley        
Verhoeven        
Street        
Mee        
Extras (1b, 5lb, 0w, 1nb)         7  
Total (44.2 overs, 3 wickets)   208  
 
FOW          1  2  3 
Total       33 81 187        
Batsman Out  2  1  3        
 
Name      O M  R W nb wd 
Alleyne  10 0 35 1  0  0 
Douglas 7.2 0 48 0  0  0 
Spring   10 2 27 1  0  0 
Mensing   7 1 33 0  1  0 
Gayle    10 0 59 1  0  0 




             Portreath  Pup 
Top Order:    competent proficient 
Middle Order: competent competent 
Lower Order:  abysmal   worthless 
Seam Bowling: mediocre  respectable 
Spin Bowling: superb    feeble 
Fielding:     feeble    abysmal 
 
MOTM: Paris

 

[Tom Halsey]

Coursework meant I didn't get time to set my orders, which only really meant I PAN'd instead of TIE'd, with the effect of the bot-bashing being more extreme.

 

[Mahindinho]

What levels are your seamers at Mahindinho? I've been getting quality seam with remarkable/exquisite, wonderful/prof, superb/resp and strong/med. The last three are all very close to popping though.

Remarkable/Remarkable
Quality/Wonderful <-- VERY close to Remarkable
Superb/Superb <-- at least half-way to Quality
Superb/Strong

 

[The Baconator]

****ing jammy, to put it lightly.

Vindscreen VIpers won the toss and elected to bat.
First Innings of: Vindscreen VIpers (go for it!)
Name 			Runs 	Balls 	4s 	6s
Umar 	c. Ul-hameed 	b. Akhlagullah 	10 	11 	1 	0
Rhodes 	c. Akhlagullah 	b. Munaf 	83 	83 	6 	2
Shahid 	c. Ul-hameed 	b. Munaf 	41 	47 	3 	2
Carless 	c. Ul-hameed 	b. Whing 	61 	69 	4 	0
Kumar (*) 	not 	out 	62 	55 	5 	1
Khurshid (+) 	c. Ul-hameed 	b. Whing 	3 	7 	0 	0
Azheruddin 	lbw 	b. Whing 	4 	4 	1 	0
Hasham 	c. Hiller 	b. Akhlagullah 	1 	2 	0 	0
Rahimuddin 	lbw 	b. Whing 	1 	9 	0 	0
Rehmatullah 	c. Ul-hameed 	b. Akhlagullah 	5 	7 	1 	0
Majid 	c. Raheem 	b. Akhlagullah 	5 	7 	0 	0
Extras (0b, 5lb, 2w, 3nb) 	10 	
Total (49.4 overs, 10 wickets) 	286 	
FOW 	1 	2 	3 	4 	5 	6 	7 	8 	9 	10
Total 	16 	128 	147 	250 	257 	261 	262 	268 	273 	286
Batsman Out 	1 	3 	2 	4 	6 	7 	8 	9 	10 	11
Name 	O 	M 	R 	W 	nb 	wd
Akhlagullah 	9.4 	0 	42 	4 	1 	1
Whing 	10 	0 	68 	4 	1 	0
Lakhani 	10 	0 	70 	0 	1 	0
Munaf 	10 	0 	51 	2 	0 	0
Wajid 	10 	0 	50 	0 	0 	1

First Innings of: DamRightImPakistani
Name 			Runs 	Balls 	4s 	6s
Raheem 	not 	out 	154 	132 	15 	2
Baloch 	st. Khurshid 	b. Hasham 	106 	128 	7 	3
Hiller 	c. Khurshid 	b. Hasham 	0 	1 	0 	0
Skelton 	lbw 	b. Rhodes 	2 	3 	0 	0
Leigertwood 	c. Khurshid 	b. Rhodes 	0 	1 	0 	0
Whing 		b. Hasham 	1 	2 	0 	0
Ul-hameed (+) 	c. Khurshid 	b. Hasham 	4 	8 	0 	0
Lakhani 	lbw 	b. Hasham 	0 	1 	0 	0
Wajid 		b. Hasham 	2 	3 	0 	0
Akhlagullah (*) 		b. Hasham 	0 	3 	0 	0
Munaf 		b. Rhodes 	0 	3 	0 	0
Extras (5b, 8lb, 1w, 0nb) 	14 	
Total (47.3 overs, 10 wickets) 	283 	
FOW 	1 	2 	3 	4 	5 	6 	7 	8 	9 	10
Total 	230 	230 	235 	235 	242 	258 	258 	272 	276 	283
Batsman Out 	2 	3 	4 	5 	6 	7 	8 	9 	10 	11
Name 	O 	M 	R 	W 	nb 	wd
Majid 	10 	0 	65 	0 	0 	0
Rahimuddin 	10 	0 	55 	0 	0 	0
Rhodes 	8.3 	0 	61 	3 	0 	0
Rehmatullah 	10 	0 	49 	0 	0 	0
Hasham 	9 	1 	40 	7 	0 	1

 

[Dead Badger]

151 run victory for me, on a TIE. I have absolutely no idea how one of the five active teams in my league contrived to lose to this shower last week. Hopefully someone a bit more competent will promote into our league next season. Not too competent, of course.

Next three matches could go either way, though; going to be an exciting few weeks. Hopefully my three TIE wins in a row will be enough to carry the day on fitness and morale.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Nice ratings -- I'd still take ya, though

*sacrifices yet another chicken to Bastardeus, the god of BT collapses*

Didn't the increase to Wonderful coincide with you buying that überbowler? If so, maybe he put it straight to high Wonderful.

My seam bowling has been Quality for absolutely ages, despite all four seamers getting trained (only three now, but that's relatively recent). Grrrr.

Na I got remarkable for a while (albeit with TIEs) up until I GFIed my 5th league game then I got exceptional. Since then I've gotten wonderful on PAN/GFI.

 

[Jungle Jumbo]

Comfortable win against the bottom placed side. I'm now 4-4 and in fourth place.

Zebras 292-4 (50)
C Cattermole 127, R Islam 67, S **** 44, Z Ghandi 34*
Saurer 121 (35.4)
A Subasinghe 3-33, C Singh Lali 3-31, A Singh 3-26

 

[brenoevo]

lol wot a crap season im having. Tried the old reverse the batting order trick in my league match yesterday n almost managed the win. I batted first and at one stage was 4 down for only 1 run lol.
College Dropouts 7/232 50 overs
Jayasuriya 66 (63) not out
Z.Kennedy 57 (91)
Pratley 49 (55) not out

surfside c.c. 5/233 45.1 overs
Maybury 84 (90) not out MOTM
Westhead 3/47

surfside c.c. College Dropouts
Top Order: proficient abysmal
Middle Order: superb proficient
Lower Order: abysmal respectable
Seam Bowling: quality superb
Spin Bowling: strong competent
Fielding: woeful woeful

Couldnt be bothered tryning nemore this season, jus hoping to finish 5th or 6th so i get dough from a play off match. My team will kick arse in div 4 if i demote and it will give me a chance to finish developing my squad, really need some more bowlers only got 2 ok ones.

 

[nibbs]

finally resumed normal service against former div I.1 side korn fed after some weeks of bt turning against my sides batsmen. batted first and made 291/2. duggan hit 126 and was backed up by fry (65) and hamshaw (84*). my bowlers delt with his batsmen gradually and they were all out in the 43rd over for 176. lee and vermaak taking three each whilst hamshaw and sweeney picked up two.

next week i face 2nd before facing the unbeaten league leaders in a fortnight. i'm pretty sure i'll beat the table topping side (this time i won't be taking it easy), but i'm not so sure about next week. napier proved quite bothersome in our past 2 meetings. last season he smashed me, a result that ultimately cost me the title and promotion, while we managed a 2 wicket win in round 2. at his home ground i just can't see how we can prevail. my side will soon be sitting on 10mil+, so if we're able to unload some of that on a new batsmen, i think that things will change though, and that could make all the difference. i still think first are catchable, there are sides in the league that should be able to beat them. for my side its a matter of remaining unbeaten for the rest of the season. i think we can do it