It's only a four and a six each over with 4 balls to spare .10 an over? I don't think so.
Might as well knock another four in there and make it 700.It's only a four and a six each over with 4 balls to spare .
I would have said the same thing about almost 900 runs in one match. But 500 isn't too far off. Someone will do it, within the next two-three years I think. Hopefully that would be a safe total though.Might as well knock another four in there and make it 700.
You would think so, but it probably won'tI would have said the same thing about almost 900 runs in one match. But 500 isn't too far off. Someone will do it, within the next two-three years I think. Hopefully that would be a safe total though.
Next on Wheel of Fortune, Ian Chappell. Special subject the bleeding obvious."If someone does get 500 there's going to be some bad bowling going on because that amounts to scoring at 10 runs an over," said Ian, without ruling out the possibility of just such a thing occurring. "With the lesser teams around it might happen.
But they weren't the top 2 bowling-attacks, the best 2 seamers in The World were missing (coincidentally, one on either side).If Aus and SA can do 434 against each other (top 2 bowling attacks in the world), I'm sure they can get 500 against a minnow on a small ground. It's only what, 60+ runs more?
Or Jayasuriya could cut his 1st ball to third-man and that could be that...If one of the big 8 decides to bat first against the minnows I'd say it's a distinct possibility. Sri Lanka or India batting first against Bermuda could be sheer murder.
If you'd said 434 would be chased successfully a few years ago people would say that's "senseless crap" as well. I don't think 500 is out of the question, although it's something I'd rather not see.500 runs are huge, and there is on way its gonna be scored against an international side in the near future, but when both the Chappell brothers sit together they are bound to come up with such senseless crap.