PhoenixFire
International Coach
Nah there's been loads.Is this the only test double in a losing cause?
Nah there's been loads.Is this the only test double in a losing cause?
Wilfred Rhodes, 4,187 first-class wickets. Don't see anyone passing that in the near future.
Quite a few actually. Included one Brian Charles Lara 3 times (nearly 4)thats a good knock
Is this the only test double in a losing cause?
RT Ponting 242
BC Lara 226
NJ Astle 222
BC Lara 221
VT Trumper 214*
RG Pollock 209
PD Collingwood 206
RN Harvey 205
GA Faulkner 204
ML Hayden 203
DL Amiss 203
BC Lara 202
L Hutton 202*
SE Gregory 201
V Sehwag 201
(Lara 196)
I dont know about 10 10's, but 10 100's would take a bit of gettingYOusaf's 10 hudreds in one year is a pretty hard one to crack..it took 80 years for somone to score 8 hundreds in an year, then i took another 30 for somone to break that and better it by 2 more...i think 10 10's in an year would stand for alteast a decade
That's a very rash statement when considering that medical and genetic science will one day allow a man to have the body of a 25 year old for ever and no one will ever die of natural causes and all organs and bodys part will be able to be replaced artificially. A cricket career could last for an infinite amount of time so any record based on pure figures - not averages - could easily be broken many times over.Never, ever, ever. Will last for ever, no doubt whatsoever.
Considering the fact that by that time, we will all have died from some natural cause or whatever. 4000 is a hell of a lot.That's a very rash statement when considering that medical and genetic science will one day allow a man to have the body of a 25 year old for ever and no one will ever die of natural causes and all organs and bodys part will be able to be replaced artificially. A cricket career could last for an infinite amount of time so any record based on pure figures - not averages - could easily be broken many times over.
Considering the fact that by that time, we will all have died from some natural cause or whatever. 4000 is a hell of a lot.
Haha, understatement.thats a good knock
Viv Richards already beat that. Got a century in 38 balls once.Nathan Astle's fastest Test 200? Its gonna take some effort to get that. Leads Sehwag by 29 balls.
Even harder would be beating his 2nd 100 in that 200. Took just 39 balls to get from 100 to 200. Fastest test century from 0 to 100 is 56 balls
That night was the only night of the series that I lasted the entire day's play.It was insane to listen to. Was listening to it on the radio in my car while breaking the speed limit to get home to watch it. Ofcourse, an over after i get home Astle knicks a wide Hoggard delivery behind. GUTTERED![]()
DAMN you!!!!!!!!!! You JUST beat me to that-'un!!!!!!!!!I think we've missed the obvious one: it's stood since the very first innings of test cricket.
Charles Bannerman scored 165 of Australia's total of 245; giving him 67.3% of his team's total. A ratio still never bested. Scorecard from cricinfo.
I hope I'm around for such a day.That's a very rash statement when considering that medical and genetic science will one day allow a man to have the body of a 25 year old for ever and no one will ever die of natural causes and all organs and bodys part will be able to be replaced artificially. A cricket career could last for an infinite amount of time so any record based on pure figures - not averages - could easily be broken many times over.
You might be.I hope I'm around for such a day.![]()