Why'd you drop Harbhajan ?It's a disgrace Powar has been left out.Seems that the Indian selectors are just trying to take the easy option and not make big decisions.Pathan or Harbhajan should really have been dropped.Harbhajan in the last year has turned into a very ordinary spinner especially
in the one day arena recently.
Really ? Last 10 games Bhajji Figures are :-Why'd you drop Harbhajan ?
He doesnt take wickets in ODIs a lot but Bhajji is mighty consistent on even pancake-flat pitches. In 9 outta 10 matches Bhajji has figures like 10-0-40-1 with the occasional clobbering that every ODI bowler suffers.
Then why the hell did Harbhajan and AA bat ahead of him in one game? I mean the Indian team does stupid things, but if Powar was that good a bat surely he wouldn't bat at 10.What do you mean ? He has heardly gotten a chance to bat and already has a fighting 50 versus England. Powar can be a decent lower order ODI batsmen as good as Pathan.
Yeah, Pathan has been picked as an allrounder. I don't see him batting any lower than 7 in the tournament so he wasn't really picked as a bowler. Pathan being selected as one of the four main bowlers given his recent form would have been disasterous, and considering they were insistant on picking the guy to give you the option of playing 5 "bowlers", you had to take 6 bowlers + him.Then why the hell did Harbhajan and AA bat ahead of him in one game? I mean the Indian team does stupid things, but if Powar was that good a bat surely he wouldn't bat at 10.
By the way, my mate noticed this and I honestly missed it when first seeing the squad. Does anyone think they chose one too many bowlers?
We only have 8 batsman including Karthik and Dhoni. Its 9 if you include Irfan I guess
I dont think we are going to play five bowlers + Irfan. We will probably play four bowlers + Irfan and IMO at least 20 overs of bowling would be shared between Sehwag, Sachin and Yuvraj with Ganguly 1/2 overs once in a while.Considering we might play 5 bowlers, we had to go for 7 including reserves.
Adharcric is counting Pathan as a bowler of 5 there, I'd imagine.I dont think we are going to play five bowlers + Irfan. We will probably play four bowlers + Irfan and IMO at least 20 overs of bowling would be shared between Sehwag, Sachin and Yuvraj with Ganguly 1/2 overs once in a while.
Huh? Pathan would play as the fifth bowler. You seem to have Pathan in the mix and still have 20 overs to be shared between the part-timers .. wtf?I dont think we are going to play five bowlers + Irfan. We will probably play four bowlers + Irfan and IMO at least 20 overs of bowling would be shared between Sehwag, Sachin and Yuvraj with Ganguly 1/2 overs once in a while.
I don't give a damn what the last 10 match figures are...more like what his trend over the past few years are.Really ? Last 10 games Bhajji Figures are :-
10-0-49-0
10-0-59-0
10-0-63-0
8-0-39-1
10-0-59-0
10-3-29-0
8-1-30-0
2-0-7-0
10-0-41-1
10-0-37-3
Seems like 5 out of 10 rather than 9 out of 10.
I think Pathan will play as the fourth bowler. As usual India will pack its side with batsmen.Huh? Pathan would play as the fifth bowler. You seem to have Pathan in the mix and still have 20 overs to be shared between the part-timers .. wtf?
I think Pathan will play as the fourth bowler. As usual India will pack its side with batsmen.
There's no way Pathan will play if we go in with only four specialist bowlers. He's simply not good enough right now. He will only play as the fifth bowler and we're honestly better off playing only four bowlers.You have to play to your strengths. Is the fifth bowler really going to be all that much more effective than the other four? I would doubt it. I'd say four bowlers including Pathan and Tendy/Yuvraj/Ganguly doing the rest would do it.
Completely agreed. Pathan as one of four would be ridiculous.There's no way Pathan will play if we go in with only four specialist bowlers. He's simply not good enough right now. He will only play as the fifth bowler and we're honestly better off playing only four bowlers.
Since 2006 Harbhajan has the 4th best economy rate in world cricket!I really don't know what Kumble, Harbhajan, Sehwag are doing in that team. They're all in dreadful form, and there's nothing to indicate they could come good.
I really hope they play Uthappa in first XI and use Sehwag only in case of injury to him. Hell, given Sehwag's recent form, I'd have picked even Kaif in the squad: at least he's an excellent fielder.
Isn't one day cricket alot to do with taking wickets though and to be fair Harbhajan hasn't taken a stack full of them.A good economy rate is fine but if your not taking wickets there's not as much pressure put on the batsmen.Since 2006 Harbhajan has the 4th best economy rate in world cricket!
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/columns/content/story/280455.html