No-one is arguing anything SJS - it's a fact that Karthik has been playing alongside Dhoni because of the fielding aspect. It's unlikely that during the World Cup (or in any ODIs that aren't just warm-ups for the World Cup), both will play - rather, Karthik will be in the squad as a backup and another proper middle-order batsman will play in his place. He's being given a chance now simply because it's the practical thing to do before such a major tournament and the experimentation should be done now (which is why India is playing these two series' against West Indies and Sri Lanka).By the way, those who argue that Kaarthick is playing as a batsman and Dhoni as keeper because Kaarthick is a better fielder seem to forget another fielder of some class, his name is Mohammad Kaif.
No. He is NOT in the side as a batsman. Vengsarkar is on record saying he is in the side as a middle order batsman.No-one is arguing anything SJS - it's a fact that Karthik has been playing alongside Dhoni because of the fielding aspect. It's unlikely that during the World Cup (or in any ODIs that aren't just warm-ups for the World Cup), both will play - rather, Karthik will be in the squad as a backup and another proper middle-order batsman will play in his place. He's being given a chance now simply because it's the practical thing to do before such a major tournament and the experimentation should be done now (which is why India is playing these two series' against West Indies and Sri Lanka).
There's no way anyone can or should drop Karthik after the innings he played in SA and the counterattack at Cuttack when the rest capitulated. Mind you, Badrinath is one man who should have been in there by now but that's all. The selectors have made a mess of Kaif in the past but he definitely didn't ask for a call-up after his pathetic showing in the domestic circuit after returning from SA. Reputations are overrated and Karthik is one man I can trust to deliver when the chips are down, even more so than some of our famed batsmen.SJS said:Keepers can field in first slip without problem. Going wider than that will start exaggerating the difference AND the chances of a keeper being a 'natural' in slips.
Coming to Kaarthick and Dhoni, the question posed is extremely pertinent. Even normally Kaarthick should have been preffered to Dhoni as a keeper but that arguement was shot down by "Dhoni is a much better bat"
Now Kaarthick is in the team not a keeper. Not even as a standby keeper. He is in the team as a middle order batsman. If he is preferable as a batsman to the likes of Laxman and Kaif and even Mongia let alone the Majumdars and Rohit Sharmas of indian cricket he must be a remarkably under valued batsman or the first three are highly over rated and other batsmen in Indian domestic cricket are not worth the bats they posess.
If he is THAT good a batsman, surely HE should be first choice keeper. If Dhoni still has to have a place in the side HE is the one who should play as a batsman. Moind you, I am not saying this because I agree that Kaarthick is such a great batsman but because whats happening right now is a joke and a cruel one for all those batsmen who have been dropped because Kaarthick - the batsman has been suddenly discovered.
Karthik should make the test side only as a keeper but he should be in the one-day side as a reserve middle-order batsman/keeper.SJS said:Kaartick SHOULD have a place in the Indian side but it should be in the Indian test side and as a wicket keeper.
That's not relevant at all. People are comparing Karthik and Dhoni in the field to explain why one is fielding and the other is keeping. Not sure how Kaif comes into the picture.SJS said:By the way, those who argue that Kaarthick is playing as a batsman and Dhoni as keeper because Kaarthick is a better fielder seem to forget another fielder of some class, his name is Mohammad Kaif.
It might be a reason, i don't know i just can't catch in Slips. I'm a good fielder anywhere else just not Slips.Cos you're used to having big gloves on?
Never had a chance to field in the slips myself as a keeper. I dunno if I'd be much good at it really, but I'd much prefer to be at cover or point anyway.