I do understand where you are coming from, the pitch is substandard in that regard and the fact that it was crumbling on day one is quite suspect. However run-making, although difficult, is not impossible.I only saw Smith bat but, in his case, the pitch was irrelevant when you consider that Sami and co dished up half volley after half volley.
Im all in favour of having some spice in the wicket to give fast bowlers encouragement on day one but when fast bowlers start bowling leg-cutters like leg breaks and chunks are flying out of the wicket on a regular basis, you know it's not right.
It's a terrible test pitch. Barry Richards said it's a 150 pitch at the start and he wasn't far wrongI do understand where you are coming from, the pitch is substandard in that regard and the fact that it was crumbling on day one is quite suspect. However run-making, although difficult, is not impossible.
I went out when Pakistan were one down and returned when SA had lost their first wicket.It's a terrible test pitch. Barry Richards said it's a 150 pitch at the start and he wasn't far wrong
That was only because of yet another outstanding innings by Yousuf. This one wont go into day 4.The most surprising thing for me wasnt that Pak were all out but that they had actually made it to 157.
I would rather have the odd pitch like this than have every game be dominated by the batsman.It's a terrible test pitch. Barry Richards said it's a 150 pitch at the start and he wasn't far wrong
Yeah that's a fair point but ideally tests should last a bit longer than 2 1/2 daysI would rather have the odd pitch like this than have every game be dominated by the batsman.
Just making up for all the run-fest's where a winner can't be found in 5 days.Yeah that's a fair point but ideally tests should last a bit longer than 2 1/2 days
You know, I've always wondered if it would be a good idea (or even possible) to have a lawn on one side and dry cracking dust bowl on the other. Would make things very interesting to bat on. If you get the balance right, you might see some great cricket.A pitch can be a minefield and a poor test wicket without actually being poor to watch cricket on. The Mumbai 2004 wicket wasn't one you'd want to appear too often in international cricket, but it was a very entertaining test match. The same applies here.
The weirdest thing about this wicket, incidentally, is how massively different it is at one end as compared to the other. One end of the wicket has big patches of live, green grass and dark surface around it, and the other end looks dry and is falling to bits already. One of the strangest test wickets I've seen.
I guess so dude and I'm sure there are thousands of bowlers out there who will agree with youJust making up for all the run-fest's where a winner can't be found in 5 days.
There has been a few examples of that over the years in county cricket where the home side had a top paceman and spinner (might have been Lancashire when Akram was playing) - basically a green-top at one end and dust bowl at the otherYou know, I've always wondered if it would be a good idea (or even possible) to have a lawn on one side and dry cracking dust bowl on the other. Would make things very interesting to bat on. If you get the balance right, you might see some great cricket.
There's no doubt, Yousuf is making a claim to be the best bat in the world at the moment.I find it extremely ironic that on the toughest wicket to bat on in this series so far, with minimal time to adapt to the conditions, Yousuf was the clear superior batsman in not only the Pakistani team, but both teams.
Flat track bully, yeah
Go Yousuf you good thing. And Kaneria turning it on is awesome as well.