I don't see why any team would need two genuine allrounders tbh. Then again, South Africa have at least 2 at any given time. *shrug*England need another good all rounder. Just when the bowling attack picks up, the batting collpases. And as soon as the batting gets good again, the bowlers lose it. England need a consistent player of both bowling and batting, and also, soeone who is decent in the field. And Im not talking about any old Freddie Flintoff, we need new blood, a cricketer who is young and has a good 12-13 years in him. I think its obvious who we need.
England need Samit Patel.
Or failing that, I would like to see Jacques Kallis.
Well thanks for finishing that debate, saved me some thought.I don't see why any team would need two genuine allrounders tbh. Then again, South Africa have at least 2 at any given time. *shrug*
When did I mention Samit Patel in my post?Well thanks for finishing that debate, saved me some thought.
and I wasnt being entirely serious with the Samit Patel thing, although I would orgasm if he did get picked.
Hayden and Fleming are both too old. I think Strauss is genuinely a better opener than Gayle in Tests. In ODIs it might be a different story...Haha, why Strauss of all people? Not Hayden? Not Gayle? Not Fleming?
Might? Gayle is a massively superior opener to Strauss in ODIs. No question.Hayden and Fleming are both too old. I think Strauss is genuinely a better opener than Gayle in Tests. In ODIs it might be a different story...