I like your optimism mate. However, we will need a completely injury-free team to have any chance and all players will need to play out of their skin to overcome those bloody Aussies. The dark-horse Windies, South Africa, Pakistan, India or Sri Lanka are all capable of winning it (state the obvious). I am just concerned about the fitness and lack of play Oram and Styris have had. Having said that, The Commonwealth Bank Series could not be a better build-up so, like you, I'm chipper about our chancesIm getting a bit optimistic about the world cup for NZ. Not this team as it is, but the two players I think we can keep, from this series,Taylor and Gillespie, will add so much to the NZ side, I think we could have a real good shot at the WC. I hope McMillan can find some form, and perform better than he has in the past. And Styris can come into the middle order too.
a top four of
McCullum
Astle
Taylor
Fleming.
is pretty good compared to other teams,
A bowling attack with Bond and Vettori leading , with Gillespie, and the all rounders of Franklin and Oram, and Patel and Mills hanging around seems pretty good.
McCullum
Astle
Taylor
Fleming
McMillan
Styris
Oram
Vettori
Franklin
Gillespie
Bond.
They won't replace Vettori, not until Fulton or somebody else steps up to inherit the team from Fleming after the World Cup. Besides, Vettori has been bowling well enough and there is no reason him and Patel can't be in the same side.
That is an absolutely massive call. I had not even considered it. To say he is a better bowler is ludicrous to be honest. No offence big guy.Patel is a must pick now IMO. He again showed why he's a better bowler than Vettori.
I think you might be right about OramI'd forget Oram unless he shows outstanding form for the rest of the Shield matches. Styris & Mills are the only players outside the current squad I'd want included.
The only thing stopping NZ being a serious threat in the WC is their top order batting.
I presonally think Patel can do a better job with the ball for us. If we have a bowling attack in the cup of Bond, Mills, Gillespie, Oram, Styris, Astle, McMillan, Patel. We've got plenty of options there and a perfect death bowler in Patel.That is an absolutely massive call. I had not even considered it. To say he is a better bowler is ludicrous to be honest. No offence big guy.
What was Vettori's ecomony rate like in that time though, especially compared to his teammates? Just as important, if not more so, in ODIsI presonally think Patel can do a better job with the ball for us. If we have a bowling attack in the cup of Bond, Mills, Gillespie, Oram, Styris, Astle, McMillan, Patel. We've got plenty of options there and a perfect death bowler in Patel.
Vettori averaged 41.66 with the ball in ODI cricket in 2006 from 13 games, and Patel averaged 20.00 with the ball in ODI in 2006 from 8 games. Says a lot IMO.
James Marshall just scored 152 not out. I think the NZ top order could have used that form today don't you? Bit of a screwup in selection there in hindsight.Taylor unluckly it seems. We're looking very shakey now. I'm somewhat glad we have the experience of McMillan in the side now, batting after Marshal. If we had James instead of Craig we'd be in so, so much trouble after the next wicket falls.
2-2 going into the final match will be exciting (unless Fulton can score a century, with marshall making 80 odd, Vettori having to hit the winning runs)
Not sure on economy rate, but I compare it to the Giles/Panesar debate.What was Vettori's ecomony rate like in that time though, especially compared to his teammates? Just as important, if not more so, in ODIs
Huge opportunity for fat-ass hereWith NZs current collapse, at least McMillan might have a decent amount of time to bat..