Yes and the better team got those two runs. England were definitely the better team in the 2005 series. Obviously not by the same distance as the Australians in the last series, but they were still the better team.This ashes was won by a better team,
the last ashes was won/lost by 2 runs (Kaspa getting caught by Jones)
1. agreed1) Australia are the best
2) England are not #2
3) Sitting out Monty for the first two test
4) They just sucked
Pakistan imo. Will England drop in the raitings now?1. agreed
2.so who is #2 Dravid? I think they are #2.
3. yup, but not the main reason
4. yup
What have Pakistan done to take the mantle of number 2 from England? Beat the West Indies at home?Pakistan imo.
So England clearly don't deserve number two by going 0-5 in a series where not even a single match was even close.What have Pakistan done to take the mantle of number 2 from England? Beat the West Indies at home?![]()
Rankings must be earned. They're not granted on potential.
But England earned their #2 by beating the best side in the world and having consistent performance for two years prior to that.So England clearly don't deserve number two by going 0-5 in a series where not even a single match was even close.
Defeat away to Pakistan is balanced by victory at home to Pakistan, therefore our victory over the crims at home means we can still be regarded #2, IMO, until Pakistan do something more noteworthy.So England clearly don't deserve number two by going 0-5 in a series where not even a single match was even close.