Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Yeah definitely.Something I was thinking about - should Sehwag open in the 2nd innings?
Yeah definitely.Something I was thinking about - should Sehwag open in the 2nd innings?
Despite the poor fielding, India are in a good position in the match, are they not? You have to select the better player in his specialist area (ie batting or fielding) always for me.This is why I've been vouching for Gambhir and Yuvraj. People underrate the importance of top-class fielders in tests until they see the guys who play for us. Now, Sehwag is actually a good fielder so he's not an issue. Jaffer and Ganguly are mediocre but it's hard to drop them if they score runs. Munaf is dreadful and really needs work but he's one of our top options with the ball at the moment. Who do you drop?
Definitely. Plus its not as if VVS (he doesn't do much wrong, fields in slips anyway and is a very good slipper), Ganguly and Kumble will be around for that many more years. Let them play if they make the best XI on their primary skill (and ATM they all do) and then ensure that up-coming players such as your guns at domestic level are good fielders.Despite the poor fielding, India are in a good position in the match, are they not? You have to select the better player in his specialist area (ie batting or fielding) always for me.
I would be comfortable if India gave South Africa any thing 350 plus in the second innings to chase. If you look at the stats, not many teams have managed 350 plus in the 4th innings. Plus, this pitch is deteriorating fast. Such a total also gives RSA impetus to chase the runs (which is far better from the Indian point as when they chase, there is a chance of playing a rash shot rather than when the batsmen go into a shell for a draw).350-360 would be on the edge of my comfort level. I wouldn't be worried, but I wouldn't be doubt-free either.
In either case, aim to bat out the day tomorrow, regardless of runs scored.
The reason I would have Sehwag opening - he is experienced at it, India has a lead and if he hangs around for some time, it can mean lots of runs for India.I wouldn't open Viru. Back Karthik, he did the team thing, but show him you're confident enough in him to do it again.
If Jaffer and Karthik get a partnership going however, say 70-0 or whatever, I'd seriously consider sending in Viru at 3.
But how often has he done well in the second innings? Its almost gifting the wicket away IMO.The reason I would have Sehwag opening - he is experienced at it, India has a lead and if he hangs around for some time, it can mean lots of runs for India..
And Ganguly batting with the tail leaves much to be desired. I might actually put Tendulkar down there, as I think he'd be better with the tail. Laxman between the wickets is not very strong and batting with the tail you'll need quick singles to keep the strike.Jaffer
Karhik
Sehwag (providing a start)
Dravid
Tendulkar
Ganguly
Laxman
That's how I'd put the batting order. The reason I have VVS so low is because he's not the stroke maker he once was, and I reckon Ganguly has the ability to score runs quicker. This is obviously a "if all goes well" order.
Sehwag's stats are as follows:But how often has he done well in the second innings? Its almost gifting the wicket away IMO.
I hate to keep harping on this, but even on flat pitches his stats suck in the second innings. The further the pitch deteriorates, the better technique you need to cope, and it really hurts him. The only way I'd open him is upon inspection tomorrow, the pitch is still in very good batting condition.Well they should get Karthik's opinion too, if he is fine with opening, then let him open. However, if he is not keen on opening, persist with Sehwag. Sehwag can provide a good solid start on this pitch, imo.
Ideally though, that shouldn't be an issue. If Karthik and Jaffer do their job, and Sehwag and Dravid do pretty well (even if only one of them), that would leave a lead of 200. Perfect for Sachin to come in, he can play his shots. Laxman guts it out really well nowadays, but that's not a problem and you'd hope that India wouldn't need to do something such as putting Sachin at 7 simply to bat with the tail. Far too low for a man averaging 37 this series.And Ganguly batting with the tail leaves much to be desired. I might actually put Tendulkar down there, as I think he'd be better with the tail. Laxman between the wickets is not very strong and batting with the tail you'll need quick singles to keep the strike.
Ideally you wouldn't. But you might in this case, and if India loose a couple wickets early I'd rather save Tendy to bat with the tail than Ganguly. He just gives them the strike way too much.Ideally though, that shouldn't be an issue. If Karthik and Jaffer do their job, and Sehwag and Dravid do pretty well (even if only one of them), that would leave a lead of 200. Perfect for Sachin to come in, he can play his shots. Laxman guts it out really well nowadays, but that's not a problem and you'd hope that India wouldn't need to do something such as putting Sachin at 7 simply to bat with the tail. Far too low for a man averaging 37 this series.
So was Steve Waugh mind you.Dravid in 2nd team innings: 50.28 (57 career)
Sehwag in 2nd team innings: 25.06 (50 career)
Tendulkar in 2nd team innings: 44.27 (55 career)
Ganguly in 2nd team innings: 39.28 (40 career)
Laxman in 2nd team innings: 41.67 (44 career)
He is by far the worst of the experienced batsmen. He stinks.
If the ball is still new due to a few early wickets, I'd bag Tendulkar to see off the new ball ahead of Ganguly and Sehwag.Ideally you wouldn't. But you might in this case, and if India loose a couple wickets early I'd rather save Tendy to bat with the tail than Ganguly. He just gives them the strike way too much.