y is that?Tbh, I don't really mind who takes over Benaud's position, as long as Benaud leaves as soon as possible. I'd be ecstatic if he chucked in the towel before 10 am tomorrow.
He's too old. All he does is state the obvious, such as "cracking shot", and "Ponting's captaincy has improved since 2005" and "Australia need a wicket". I was so cut when I got Cricket 05 and he was the commentator.y is that?
oh ok, i dont agree with that but everyone is intitled to an opinionHe's too old. All he does is state the obvious, such as "cracking shot", and "Ponting's captaincy has improved since 2005" and "Australia need a wicket". I was so cut when I got Cricket 05 and he was the commentator.
Unless you can prove otherwise, i seriously doubt if "wearing the bone" has anything at all to do with the captaincy and is a myth created by Billy Birmingham's mockery of the team with the 12th man. However it this is not the case, i'd be interested to see/know where you read/heard thisritche's still wearing the bone so he still captain, dont no y he isnt on screen anymore though, maybe he is slowly retiring
well then wat is the significance of the bone jackets while all other members where navy?Unless you can prove otherwise, i seriously doubt if "wearing the bone" has anything at all to do with the captaincy and is a myth created by Billy Birmingham's mockery of the team with the 12th man. However it this is not the case, i'd be interested to see/know where you this
acutal thats funny u say that as in this series they were talkin to ritchie about commentating and he said the key to commentary is not stating the obviousHe's too old. All he does is state the obvious, such as "cracking shot", and "Ponting's captaincy has improved since 2005" and "Australia need a wicket". I was so cut when I got Cricket 05 and he was the commentator.
i never based anything on the twelfth man, acutal well, i took it that the bone ment captain or mostly on screen and it makes sense but, wat is the significance of the bone, the white, the off-white, and the bajeThere may have been some significance previously, but i highly doubt it now. Anyway, as i said, it seriously sounds like your relying on what the 12th man alone has said, which at times can hardly be described as a reliable source. Also if thats the case, do you beleive that Mark Nicholas says "Smashing Baby" and only ever talks about "shags" as well??
y make him stand out and no one else?...is it coz he is the CTC?Because it was just a suggestion by Kerry Packer (IIRC) to help him stand out. It has no significance. It's just a jacket.
Of course he'd say that. It's the only thing he knows how to do nowadays.acutal thats funny u say that as in this series they were talkin to ritchie about commentating and he said the key to commentary is not stating the obvious
It's the same as Richie headlining the BBC's coverage for so many years. I'm a fan of Mark Nicholas tbh, despite the caning he gets from some people, and I'd have no problem with him taking over the captaincy (though as many have pointed out, he is already the captain in all but name these days).It will be Nicholas, but I have no idea why we'd get a pom to headline OUR cricket. Makes no sense imo.
What about when Richie wears the cream, white, off-white, ivory or beige? Who's captain then?the captain of the commentary team wheres the bone, ritchie wears the bone nicholas doesnt
You're better off for it. Bumble >>>>> NicholasThat being said, I won't be living back in Australia for years, so it's unlikely to affect me anyway for a while. I'll just have to stick with Nasser, Athers, Both, Gower and co over here.
I've never known cricket TV commentary in Australia without those 3. Tony and Bill annoy the hell out of me more often than not, but it will still seem strange when they're not in the commentary box.I don't mind the new folk - Nicholas, Slater, Taylor and Healy (and Warne next Summer).
Lawry, Greig and Benaud must go though.