benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Top response, got mePull the other one. It's got bells on it.
Top response, got mePull the other one. It's got bells on it.
In a weird way, I think it helped them. Also hard to qualify homesickness as depression though.Makes you wonder how the guys really felt in the old days when it was a month by boat each way with four months in Australia in the middle, and communication with home limited to airmail and telegrams at best
I can see what you mean - out of sight is out of mind and all thatIn a weird way, I think it helped them. Also hard to qualify homesickness as depression though.
No, no. I don't mean technical diagnosis. More like people around him, the journalists, the couches, etc. saying it. I remember reading an article on it, with verbatim quotes from someone in the team. Almost believe it might have been Donald.Don't believe Harmison has ever been diagnosed iirc.
Being gay isn't tho. Wouldn't want to conflate the two. Kudos to Davies for coming out, but it's possible he's a totally well adjusted young fella, mentally speaking.I think English cricketers just have more of a precedent to be able to admit this kinda thing. I mean, Davies came out, so citing depression isn't a big deal anymore.
Depression is a horrible illness btw.
Neither being gay or suffering from depression fit in with the macho sporting stereotype though.Being gay isn't tho. Wouldn't want to conflate the two. Kudos to Davies for coming out, but it's possible he's a totally well adjusted young fella, mentally speaking.
Controversial.Neither being gay or suffering from depression fit in with the macho sporting stereotype though.
Fletcher then went on to absolutely tear into Freddie in his book, for turning up to training drunk etc. Granted, he still shouldn't have done that, but given that England were aware of his problems....well **** you Fletcher.good work dunc
Piss-weak management, tbh. Fred should never have got the gig back after Strauss made such a good fist of his first go. Dunc's rationale seemed to be that it would've upset Flintoff more than the incumbent to miss out, which is such a poor reason on so many levels.Fletcher then went on to absolutely tear into Freddie in his book, for turning up to training drunk etc. Granted, he still shouldn't have done that, but given that England were aware of his problems....well **** you Fletcher.
4-0 you fat old ****.
Yeah, tbh I'm not entirely sure Freddie would have kicked up quite the fuss Fletcher anticipated anyway, but even so it is a poor decision on every level. Imagine if you were denied a promotion in work because someone else who had previously been seconded to the role would be upset about it. It is beyond belief really. And one suspects that it was actually Harmison's reaction he was more worried about, well if he was worried about Harmison (which obviously he should have been, going by this thread) I think there might just have been better ways to look after things than having his own handpicked captain. And I'll bet you Flintoff not giving Harmison the new ball hurt him a lot more than if it had been Strauss who made said decision.Piss-weak management, tbh. Fred should never have got the gig back after Strauss made such a good fist of his first go. Dunc's rationale seemed to be that it would've upset Flintoff more than the incumbent to miss out, which is such a poor reason on so many levels.
At the same time though, what if Strauss had led us to a 5-0 defeat in Australia? Who do you turn to when KP and Moores have a massive falling out?Yeah, tbh I'm not entirely sure Freddie would have kicked up quite the fuss Fletcher anticipated anyway, but even so it is a poor decision on every level. Imagine if you were denied a promotion in work because someone else who had previously been seconded to the role would be upset about it. It is beyond belief really. And one suspects that it was actually Harmison's reaction he was more worried about, well if he was worried about Harmison (which obviously he should have been, going by this thread) I think there might just have been better ways to look after things than having his own handpicked captain. And I'll bet you Flintoff not giving Harmison the new ball hurt him a lot more than if it had been Strauss who made said decision.
Some people have contested this, but I think the decision to make Flintoff captain weakened both of their performances considerably, and given how important they had both been to us in the previous couple of years, that was something we couldn't afford. Think the only way he could have made things any worse would have been to upset Pietersen somehow as tbh without KP we'd have found a way to lose that series 7-0.
Add in the Giles/Panesar and Read/Jones fiascos and we really ought to have asked for his ****ing MBE back.
4-0, ****
Yeah, I agree in theory but then again by changing the captain in 06-07 you don't know what else you change down the line and there might well be no KP-Moores fallout.At the same time though, what if Strauss had led us to a 5-0 defeat in Australia? Who do you turn to when KP and Moores have a massive falling out?
**** happens for a reason. Fletcher's appaling management in 2006 has turned out to have massive benefits for England 5 years down the line.
True, but I don't know how much else would have changed to be honest between that campaign and the West Indies tour 2 years later to be honest. Vaughan was always coming back and Strauss was overlooked in 2008 because they wanted one captain for all formats. You'd still have had Moores as coach and KP as captain.Yeah, I agree in theory but then again by changing the captain in 06-07 you don't know what else you change down the line and there might well be no KP-Moores fallout.
Of course I'm glad Strauss is captain now, and he'd have likely not recovered from 5-0, but it doesn't make any of it less galling.
And of course I make no apologies for Freddie being one of my favourite sportspeople ever and to see Fletcher stick the boot in in his book annoyed me anyway, but even more so now.
4-0, ****
We're talking cricket here right? The one where the gangly, the soft-spoken and the unathletic have performed?Neither being gay or suffering from depression fit in with the macho sporting stereotype though.