Apologies for that - I was trying to move the timeline forward though I had no option but to go backwards and pick a player and scorecard that was difficult to work from. Fingers crossed that by the time of our next selections we'll have a bit more choice!Awful scorecard lol.. You blocked off three of my main choices right there. Now I have to think lol..
Yeah, I think we deserve a good pick in the next round or two lol..Apologies for that - I was trying to move the timeline forward though I had no option but to go backwards and pick a player and scorecard that was difficult to work from. Fingers crossed that by the time of our next selections we'll have a bit more choice!
Certainly a good pick. I had my eyes on him due to that impressive record.
Incidentally thats the same scorecard I used to pick Bates - I wonder if we're destined to go around in circles in this draft...
I'm going to sound a bit mean here (lol) but you've actually kind of regressed the timeframe, because Peel's last test was 1896 and Steel's in 1888.I've moved the timeframe forward lol but not by that much.
This guy is a steel at this stage - Allan Steel
1st Test: England v Australia at Lord's, Jul 16-17, 1888 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
6 Allan Steel
7
8
9 Fred Trueman
10 Muttiah Muralitharan
11 Charlie Turner
Good PickI've moved the timeframe forward lol but not by that much.
This guy is a steel at this stage - Allan Steel
1st Test: England v Australia at Lord's, Jul 16-17, 1888 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
6 Allan Steel
7
8
9 Fred Trueman
10 Muttiah Muralitharan
11 Charlie Turner
Yeah ,that Batsmen would have been a good pick too,certanly as good as steel but would have pushed the timeline ahead.I'm going to sound a bit mean here (lol) but you've actually kind of regressed the timeframe, because Peel's last test was 1896 and Steel's in 1888.
To be fair, by looking at Steel's stats he seems to have been a very good all-rounder but you could have had one of the top batsmen of his era from 1896.
Obviously, you might think I'm talking tripe and probably justifiably but I'm just offering my two cents.
I know I've basically regressed it, but I might not get another go for the next 25 selections and my last pick I made helped the person after me get Grace, so I didn't want to set people up again.I'm going to sound a bit mean here (lol) but you've actually kind of regressed the timeframe, because Peel's last test was 1896 and Steel's in 1888.
To be fair, by looking at Steel's stats he seems to have been a very good all-rounder but you could have had one of the top batsmen of his era from 1896.
Obviously, you might think I'm talking tripe and probably justifiably but I'm just offering my two cents.