New Cricinfo Format

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

It's terrible IMO! Terrible! Everything was so reader friendly before and I'm really uncertain as to why this change came about.

See here: Don Bradman

What do you guys think?

 

[C_C]

time to notify the ayatollah

 

[SJS]

It's terrible IMO! Terrible! Everything was so reader friendly before and I'm really uncertain as to why this change came about.

See here: Don Bradman

What do you guys think?

This is a summary page. They havent done away with the earlier details available with the basic or advanced filter. as in Don Bradman details

 

[chaminda_00]

It looks more professional and more simliar to other stats pages around the web. It going to take some time to get used but i don't think it is terrible.

 

[vic_orthdox]

It'd help if the font was a bit bigger, and it was easier to establish between lines. One stage I'm reading along List A, next I'm reading first class averages.

 

[Adamc]

The best feature of the new design IMO is that you can search for players who haven't played Tests or ODIs, instead of having to go through the country pages.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

I'm not sure what's professional about it. I'm also not sure why they feel the need to conform to anyone's format. Cricketarchive still rocks the reader-friendly format AFAIK.

 

[Scaly piscine]

I think it's fine apart from the stats are not very clear - they've gone for aesthetics over practicality.

 

[Mister Wright]

I don't mind it at all. However, I agree that the font should be a little larger.

 

[Tom Halsey]

I have no problem with it.

 

[Kweek]

it takes time to get used to it, but i like it.

 

[superkingdave]

its a backwards step if you ask me

 

[Pratters]

I like the new format MUCH more.

Crisper and classier. I also like smaller fonts which may be a reason.

 

[Scaly piscine]

I like the new format MUCH more.

Crisper and classier. I also like smaller fonts which may be a reason.

I've got my resolution set to 1280x960 so everything looks like a small font, I still can't believe so many people use 800x600 - everything looks so different (and pixellated). Maybe the new format looks better under a certain resolution.

 

[Pratters]

I've got my resolution set to 1280x960 so everything looks like a small font, I still can't believe so many people use 800x600 - everything looks so different (and pixellated). Maybe the new format looks better under a certain resolution.

Mine is 1024 into 768

Still the new format is tinier for me.

 

[SpeedKing]

Don't know about a backward step but that about the format before being more user friendly is quite true if you ask me. However, i have no problem with it. Now they have put batting apart from bowling which i feel i an improvement from before

 

[Neil Pickup]

I've got my resolution set to 1280x960 so everything looks like a small font, I still can't believe so many people use 800x600 - everything looks so different (and pixellated). Maybe the new format looks better under a certain resolution.

Certainly doesn't look any cop on 1400x1050...

 

[marc71178]

It looks more professional and more simliar to other stats pages around the web. It going to take some time to get used but i don't think it is terrible.

Yes, I have to say familiarity with it and you'll have forgotten what it used to be like.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Certainly doesn't look any cop on 1400x1050...

Just showing off now... bet my monitor is bigger than your monitor tho.

 

[Natman20]

It's terrible IMO! Terrible! Everything was so reader friendly before and I'm really uncertain as to why this change came about.

See here: Don Bradman

What do you guys think?

I think its pretty good