The Establishment Boys
Archie Mac and Martin Chandler |Published: 2024
Pages: 304
Author: Nicholls, Barry
Publisher: Pitch
Rating: 3.5 stars
Not too many cricket books run to three editions, and it is doubtless a measure of the mark that World Series Cricket made on the game that Barry Nicholls look at the fortunes of the official Australian side during that schism has been one of the few to do so.
The first edition, published by New Holland, appeared in 2016, which is when I reviewed it. The book then underwent a reworking five years later under the aegis of new publishers, Wakefield. Archie reviewed that one.
The third edition, published by Pitch, is essentially a reprint, with just a few changes and some new photographs. For that reason we are not going to review the book for a third time, but the level of continued interest certainly justifies re-posting the two earlier reviews.
Martin’s Review
Professional cricket changed forever in the 1970s. The catalyst was Australian media tycoon Kerry Packer and his decision, after the Australian Broadcasting Corporation refused to sell him the rights to broadcast Test cricket, to buy up the world’s best players and start his own rival attraction; World Series Cricket (WSC).
There has always been a good deal of interest in WSC, and no shortage of the those willing to discuss it. Not counting Jeff Thomson, who at different times had a foot in each camp, no fewer than 33 of the men who played for Packer’s rival attraction have written autobiographies or been the subject of books written by others. There were also two books published at the time chronicling the story as a whole, and there have been a couple more since.
Against that backdrop it is easy to forget that during the WSC hiatus Australia played 24 official Test matches. With the exception of Thomson no Packer player was selected for any of those matches. There were 31 men capped during this period, all but eight of them debutants. Of the 31 only the stories of Bob Simpson, called back to the colours a decade after retirement to captain the side, future skippers Alan Border and Kim Hughes and bowlers Bruce Yardley and Rod Hogg have ever appeared in print.
There is however an irony as far as the cricket was concerned. All who saw them say that the WSC matches contained some dramatic cricket of the highest quality. Despite that even today there is no trace of the matches in the official statistics of the game. On the other hand the Tests played by an Australian side missing 28 of their leading players are still very much part of the record books. The first series, in Australia against India, was keenly contested and won 3-2 by the Australians, although a return series two years later was less interesting. England’s losses to WSC were not great, and an almost full strength England won the 78-79 Ashes 5-1. West Indies, complete with WSC players were far too strong for Simpson’s men although when WSC’s West Indians took their leave part way through the 1977/78 series the remaining matches were rather more competitive. A year later the Australians, by then led by Hughes, did take a Test from a full strength Pakistan side, however in the 1979 World Cup only Canada were beaten.
By choosing to tell the story of the Australians who remained loyal to the board Barry Nicholls has chosen a subject no writer has sought to concentrate on before. With five Test series to look at, of which only the 1978/79 Ashes series has been written about at any length, as well as the lives and careers of so many lesser lights there was never going to be a shortage of material. Add to that the fact that, having been there as a teenager, Nicholls had his own vivid memories to draw on and my expectations of The Establishment Boys were pretty high.
The book hit the shops last year so there has been something of a delay in reviewing it. Part of the reason for that was my being rather put off by a review I read a little while ago. One of the game’s foremost writers spent most of a two page review highlighting a number typos and a couple of continuity errors. He isn’t wrong, and a better proof reader would certainly have ironed out all the problems that are identified, but rather more time could and should have been spent on the book’s real strength, the simple fact that it is an interesting subject.
The early chapters, which give the background to the momentous split, have of course been covered before, but never to my knowledge from the perspective of those who represented Australia during those 24 Tests. There follows an account of the matches themselves. No writer can make ordinary cricket memorable, and whilst there were some notable individual performances and a handful of exciting games the reality is that most of the matches involving The Establishment Boys were fairly mundane. It was however Nicholls’ duty to the game’s future historians to give an account of the play, and it is difficult to see how he could have done that any better with the material at his disposal.
The most interesting aspect of the book, probably inevitably, are the closing chapters that contain a post mortem and the obligatory accounts of what The Establishment Boys went on to achieve in the rest of their careers and, more importantly given that only seven of them played any more international cricket, what they did with their lives after leaving the game. The most interesting characters, to this reviewer, are probably Ian ‘Mad Dog’ Callen and Rick Darling, but the tales of those who scale the game’s heights only fleetingly are always of particular interest, and there are plenty of them here.
The selection of photographs that illustrate The Establishment Boys is excellent, and the scorecards of the 24 Tests are faithfully reproduced. It would have been useful to have a summary of the career statistics of the players, but along with the proof reading issues those are minor complaints about a book that is a thoroughly worthwhile way of whiling away a few hours of its reader’s time.
Archie’s Review
It was huge back in the day. The best players from around the world were bought by Kerry Packers’ World Series Cricket (WSC). The biggest impact was to the Australian team with the vast majority of the best two dozen players defecting.
As Author Barry Nicholls points out, the victors tend to write history. So, most who know their cricket will be familiar with WSC through a number of books, a miniseries and the commentary from those involved, who were all Packer men. Richie Benaud and Ian Chappell in particular commented extensively on the quality of the cricket played during WSC and the class of the combatants involved. What you didn’t hear from the ‘victors’ was about those who replaced the WSC Australian players.
The Establishment Boys focuses on those who stepped into the breach when the WSC players were banned by the Australian Cricket Board (ACB). The players took great pride in their performances and were proud to represent their country no matter the circumstances of their selection.
Nicholls writes with respect for his subjects and appears to have drawn out some honest answers from the players he interviewed. A regular theme was the lack of support from the ACB and the unrelenting pressure from the press.
For instance, Graham Yallop who captained in the 1978/79 season, had to organise everything from practice, to the laundry collection to taxis to transport the team to the Test matches. The press also never let Yallop forget his quip at the start of the Ashes series that Australia would win six nil. In the end the Aussies lost by five Tests to one.
Nicholls introduces each new player as they are selected to play for Australia, providing a brief synopsis of their journey to Test cricket. The selectors don’t make it easy for him with sometimes three or four new players picked from Test to Test. Pick and stick was certainly not the theme of the ACB selectors during the WSC years.
The author highlights some of the difficulties in the relations between selectors and players at the time, especially the lack of communication. Players often seem to find out about their selection, or worse axing, from journalists, family or even people at work.
Wayne Clark, who was Australia’s most successful bowler against India, was surprisingly left out of the Ashes series the following summer. A journalist told him it was because his action was considered dubious and there was a gentlemen’s agreement between England and Australia that no one with a suspect action would be chosen for the Ashes. Clark’s attempts to obtain clarity from the ACB fell on deaf ears. Sure enough, after not featuring in the Ashes series, Clark was brought back for the two Test series against Pakistan later that summer.
Ian Callen was another story of mismanagement. Selected to make his debut for his country he was also included in the team for an upcoming tour of the West Indies. The day before his first Test, Callen was unbelievably sent for five inoculation injections in preparation for the West Indies tour. Callen had a reaction to the jab for yellow fever and failed to do himself justice in his first Test match.
Nicholls concludes his book with a ‘where are they now?’ chapter. Again, Nicholls solicits some honest responses from those he interviewed. Almost all of whom mention the lack of support from the ACB and their feelings of being discarded once the WSC players were again available for selection. It was interesting to see that a couple of the players did very well for themselves post cricket, although there were also a couple of melancholy stories too.
Thank you for taking the time to review my book. To point out that the original, while in substance, held its own, had many errors in publication. The book was unnecessarily re-edited at the last moment and then, with little consideration, rushed to print. While Martin was kind enough to review it (I probably wouldn’t have as it had obvious production errors) and do so in a generous way, the review that should be best-taken notice of is Archie’s.
I also wonder if combining two ratings ( one of a book that wasn’t appropriately published) is the correct way to evaluate its worth. The critical review to which Martin refers was little more than pointing out the obvious in a patronising, condescending and unnecessary way by someone who should have known better (as should have the publisher of that review). While all is fair in books and publishing, the mean-spirited approach of the reviewer and his publisher revealed more about them than the original book. I hope readers enjoy the latest UK edition.
Comment by Barry Nicholls | 4:45am BST 19 June 2024