-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Young Lara vs Old Lara
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I liked all of that.. including the so-called down period Lara coz that was also the peak of his batting achievements. 1999 
HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
The second peak has the Murali 2001 series- arguably the greatest series by a visiting bat in the SC
Sliferxxxx
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Excellent question. Probably first peak because he faced some serious bowling then, and except for the series in India he passed with flying colors:
Australia (a): 400 runs at 58 (Warne, McDermott, Hughes, Reid )
Pakistan (h): 200 runs at 43 (peak Waqar and great Wasim)
Eng(h): 800 runs at 99. (Caddick, Fraser)
Ind (a): 200 runs at 33 (Kumble)
NZ (a): 150 runs at 75
Aus (h): 300 runs at 44 ( Warne, McGrath, Reifel)
Eng (a): 765 runs at 85 (Fraser, Cork, Gough)
NZ (h): 150 runs at 50.
Then came his disastrous tour of Aus and a couple middling series vs India then his fall that began with the SL series.
Australia (a): 400 runs at 58 (Warne, McDermott, Hughes, Reid )
Pakistan (h): 200 runs at 43 (peak Waqar and great Wasim)
Eng(h): 800 runs at 99. (Caddick, Fraser)
Ind (a): 200 runs at 33 (Kumble)
NZ (a): 150 runs at 75
Aus (h): 300 runs at 44 ( Warne, McGrath, Reifel)
Eng (a): 765 runs at 85 (Fraser, Cork, Gough)
NZ (h): 150 runs at 50.
Then came his disastrous tour of Aus and a couple middling series vs India then his fall that began with the SL series.
DrWolverine
State 12th Man
There was something magical about seeing the revival of Brian Lara who was trying stem the decline of WI with the support of young Shiv, Sarwan, Gayle etc
PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Lara had a pretty poor year in 2002 so maybe the peak should be 2003-2005. That way it’s also the same amount of years as the first peak.
His best two series probably came outside of the two peaks which is interesting.
His best two series probably came outside of the two peaks which is interesting.
He broke his right forearm few weeks before India toured in early 2002. He used the matches against India to build back strength in his long rested forearm. He did pretty decently against New Zealand later that year.
His upswing back to his earlier super-consistency actually started from the 600 run Sri Lanka series in late 2001 itself although his figures in 2002 might not directly reflect that.
As Lara admits here (while pulling out of then West Indies tour to Zimbabwe in 2001) - he was injured for the entire 2000-01 season, even though he was unfit "the challenge of playing Australia and South Africa was irresistible".
L Trumper
State Regular
Yeah, his two peak periods are 92 - 96 (before the Aus tour) & 03 - 06. But delivered the best batting performances (99 AUS, 01 SL) since WW2 during his low period.I liked all of that.. including the so-called down period Lara coz that was also the peak of his batting achievements. 1999
As for the question from OP, options should be 92 - 96 (He is the best batter during this time, with Sachin close second) & 03 - 06 (In the Top 3, but probably behind Ponting & Dravid during this time)
L Trumper
State Regular
With a strike rate around 70 to boot. He was mesmerizing during this time.
DrWolverine
State 12th Man
Lara was also the best one day batsman at that time
DrWolverine
State 12th Man
1993-1995
Lara : 27 Tests. 2804 runs. Avg of 66. 7 centuries.
1993-1998
Lara : 100 ODIs. 4467 runs. Avg of 51. 12 centuries
Lara : 27 Tests. 2804 runs. Avg of 66. 7 centuries.
1993-1998
Lara : 100 ODIs. 4467 runs. Avg of 51. 12 centuries
Sliferxxxx
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
2002 can be ignored considering he completely messed up his elbow after that collision with i believe it was Attapatu
shortpitched713
International Captain
I miss the old Lara, straight from the go Lara.
Chop up the ball Lara, set on his goals Lara.
Chop up the ball Lara, set on his goals Lara.
Very hard to split.
Lara had a 50+ innings in 11 of his first 13 Test matches and this included Test matches in Australia, Test matches against peak Wasim-Waqar in 1993 and a one-off Test match against Donald in 1992. Very decent consistency against great attacks.
He missed it by a whisker in his debut innings against Wasim & Waqar in December 1990 (got out to Abdul Qadir on 44).
Have to go with the new Lara though. Had a 500+ run series when Aussie pace bowlers were raining down high pace bumpers at him. Repeated the 500+ run feat in South Africa when their pace bowlers did the same. He also tightened his technique, wisened up against the likes of McGrath (of the 16 innings they played against each other during this time, McGrath got him just once and that after Lara scored 226 in that innings). And he did all this without compromising on the basic attacking nature of his game.
Very unusually Lara's slump came bang in the middle of his career, from Aus tour in December 1996 to Aus tour in early 2001. A period of about 4.5 years. You could probably excuse his performances towards the end of this 4.5 year period, against Aus in 2000-01 and later South Africa in 2001 because as I said earlier he played those series even though he was not fit because the challenge was irresistible.
Lara averaged in the 30s during this low period. During this time, he basically was like how Hooper was throughout his career.
It wasn't like he was failing only against great attacks during this 4.5 year period, his Test averages against Sri Lanka and England during this slump time were 30 and 37, and neither side during that time had an attack so formidable as to result in those stats.
Irony though is, his most iconic performance - Aus 99 - came right in the middle of this slump period.
Lara had a 50+ innings in 11 of his first 13 Test matches and this included Test matches in Australia, Test matches against peak Wasim-Waqar in 1993 and a one-off Test match against Donald in 1992. Very decent consistency against great attacks.
He missed it by a whisker in his debut innings against Wasim & Waqar in December 1990 (got out to Abdul Qadir on 44).
Have to go with the new Lara though. Had a 500+ run series when Aussie pace bowlers were raining down high pace bumpers at him. Repeated the 500+ run feat in South Africa when their pace bowlers did the same. He also tightened his technique, wisened up against the likes of McGrath (of the 16 innings they played against each other during this time, McGrath got him just once and that after Lara scored 226 in that innings). And he did all this without compromising on the basic attacking nature of his game.
Very unusually Lara's slump came bang in the middle of his career, from Aus tour in December 1996 to Aus tour in early 2001. A period of about 4.5 years. You could probably excuse his performances towards the end of this 4.5 year period, against Aus in 2000-01 and later South Africa in 2001 because as I said earlier he played those series even though he was not fit because the challenge was irresistible.
Lara averaged in the 30s during this low period. During this time, he basically was like how Hooper was throughout his career.
It wasn't like he was failing only against great attacks during this 4.5 year period, his Test averages against Sri Lanka and England during this slump time were 30 and 37, and neither side during that time had an attack so formidable as to result in those stats.
Irony though is, his most iconic performance - Aus 99 - came right in the middle of this slump period.