with Murali at least you can make the case that he might be the best bowler with 800 wickets200 - Ishant Sharma
400 - Harbhajan Singh
800 - Muttiah Muralitharan
definitelykapil dev a better bowler than harbhajan
.
He is up there, better than Harbhajan though for me.420 - Jimmy Anderson
Harbhajan has 417He is up there, better than Harbhajan though for me.
Harbhajan, Anderson and Dev are a tier below the rest of the 400 + club.
He is but he is a definitely a tier below the likes of Hadlee, Ambrose, Wasim, Walsh etcPeople who diss JimmyA haven't watched him bowl in the last 5 years.
He's a magnificent bowler.
It seems like you just plucked 420 because you wanted to pick Anderson.Harbhajan has 417
Haha yeahIt seems like you just plucked 420 because you wanted to pick Anderson.
nopes, Sami is king for 85 wicketsDaren Powell - 85 at 48 - worst of a bad bunch by a distance
In terms of averages I have to bow out there, but remembering both of them pretty well I'd have to say I think Sami was a considerably better bowlernopes, Sami is king for 85 wickets
85 at 53
Mohammad Sami | Pakistan Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
I think Sami was a better bowler than Powell.nopes, Sami is king for 85 wickets
85 at 53
Mohammad Sami | Pakistan Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo