• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Worst batsman ever to score a Test match 100

Langeveldt

Soutie
I'm going to go for Jerome Taylor.. In terms of recent years, his competition would include

1. Jason Gillespie
2. Saqlain Mushtaq
3. Dwayne Smith
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I'm going to go for Jerome Taylor.. In terms of recent years, his competition would include

1. Jason Gillespie
2. Saqlain Mushtaq
3. Dwayne Smith
Rafique is worth a mention IMO. He's a little better than Saqlain though; I reckon he takes the cake.
 

dontcloseyoureyes

BARNES OUT
Watched extended highlights of Dizzy not long ago, he played some absolutely terrific shots in that knock. Had forgotten just how well he played.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The worst batsmen I have seen (as opposed to bowlers/keepers who can bat a bit) who have recorded test centuries are Adrian Griffith and Trevor Franklin
 

protea lover

Cricket Spectator
yeah he is a capable batsman, but not one good enough to deserve a test century.. Warnie on the other hand did I think
Warnie never really focused though. He would always try to smash the ball rather than finesse it. I liked dizzy more as a taileneder as he would be harder to dismiss IMO. especially if you have a guy like hussey at the other end smashing you to all parts and then a tailender that blocks and leaves alot.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
If one goes by averages then Saqlain is the top (bottom?) boy of the ton-up brigade with a test tally of only 14.48 runs per innings.

Running him a close second tho with an average of 14.50 was an SA pre-war leggie who rejoiced in the quite wonderful name of Xenophon Constantine Balaskas who managed only 174 runs in his entire test career, but 122 of them coming in one unbeaten knock.

His overall FC record suggests he was probably a fair bit better than his test stats would have us believe tho.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Pure 'batsman', Daren Ganga from recent times.
Ganga > Dwayne Smith IMO. At least Ganga scores runs at First Class level ocassionally - Smith only averages about 25 even there. I suppose you could argue that Smith's more of an allrounder than a pure batsman but he was selected as a specialist batsman when he made that debut ton.
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
Ganga > Dwayne Smith IMO. At least Ganga scores runs at First Class level ocassionally - Smith only averages about 25 even there. I suppose you could argue that Smith's more of an allrounder than a pure batsman but he was selected as a specialist batsman when he made that debut ton.
He (Smith) is the second worst cricketer to play for a test side other than Bangladesh and Zimbabwe that I've ever seen.. Absolutely appaling player and that century he scored against SA made me want to rip my eyes out
 

Jigga988

State 12th Man
Ganga > Dwayne Smith IMO. At least Ganga scores runs at First Class level ocassionally - Smith only averages about 25 even there. I suppose you could argue that Smith's more of an allrounder than a pure batsman but he was selected as a specialist batsman when he made that debut ton.
There are lots of Windies batsman who will have the odd good flash innings, - Taylor, Smith and Marshall will probobly have one soon, but they will never have the temprament to do anything sustainable, as it goes though they arn't bad batsman, meaning they got some talent. It's just there temprament that weighs them down.

Ganga is a bit of an anomoly, don't know what to make of him, should in theorry be a good opener and a good foil to Gayle but just always gets out, quite baffling really.
 

Jigga988

State 12th Man
He (Smith) is the second worst cricketer to play for a test side other than Bangladesh and Zimbabwe that I've ever seen.. Absolutely appaling player and that century he scored against SA made me want to rip my eyes out
Don't see why that century would have wanted to make you do that, it wasn't a bad innings, just like Taylor's really. He (Smith) will probobly get a nother run in England because one of either Marshall or Chatergoon will get dropped, hopefully it's the latter.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Don't see why that century would have wanted to make you do that, it wasn't a bad innings, just like Taylor's really. He (Smith) will probobly get a nother run in England because one of either Marshall or Chatergoon will get dropped, hopefully it's the latter.
Dwayne Bravo is still to come back from injury though, so he'll be the one to replace Chattergoon or Marshall. There's a few seemingly ahead of Dwayne Smith in the queue right now anyway; I doubt he'll be playing a Test any time soon.
 

protea lover

Cricket Spectator
This shows me how out of touch I am with their current side.
Last time I saw them play Chattergoon and Marshall were good up and comers and smith and bravo were on the way out.
 

Top