I should've been a bit more clear. I meant in terms of attitude. Someone like Sachin Tendulkar would never make the team in a million years. The same would probably go for Brett Lee. My emphasis is on the mental side of things.FaaipDeOiad said:I'm taking aggressive as primarily an attacking play style, with minimal emphasis on personal demeanor.
Current XI
Matthew Hayden
Virender Sehwag
Ricky Ponting (c)
Brian Lara
Chris Gayle
Andrew Flintoff
Adam Gilchrist (k)
Shane Warne
Brett Lee
Shoaib Akhtar
Andre Nel
Nice circular team, SJSSJS said:Gilchrist
Sehwag
Richards
Lara
Miller
Botham
Jessop
Kapil
Constantine
Prasanna
Gilchrist
If you're really looking for a slogfest side, you'd want Symonds in there I think, maybe instead of Ponting.Steulen said:Nice circular team, SJS
Current ODI Slogfest XI (yes, I know, different emphasis, so sue me):
Gilchrist (...Adam...Gilchrist)
Gayle
Ponting
Van Bunge (mandatory Dutchman; fastest ever Young MCC century though, so 'legitimate' claim)
Flintoff
Cairns
Afridi
Kemp
Lee
Mills
Nel
A bit light on spin bowling perhaps, but that wouldn't be too much of a problem I guess
Good call. Of course Van Bunge would be the most obvious one to miss out .FaaipDeOiad said:If you're really looking for a slogfest side, you'd want Symonds in there I think, maybe instead of Ponting.
I agree. Shane Warne is actually a defensive bowler as was seen when he was attacked by the Indian barsmen. I must confess I forgot about Syd Barnes. He was really aggressive.a massive zebra said:Why are people picking Warne? The Aussie may be an aggressive batsman but he is primarily a bowler and has a strike rate of nearly 60. Even his deputy Stuart MacGill is superior in this regard.
Victor Trumper
Virender Sehwag
Viv Richards
Brian Lara
Clem Hill
Adam Gilchrist
Kapil Dev
Malcolm Marshall
Waqar Younis
Shoaib Akhtar
Sydney Barnes
I wouldn't say he was a defensive bowler, my point was there have been many more aggressive bowlers in the past. As you say, when things turn against him he tends to go defensive - as most bowlers would.SJS said:I agree. Shane Warne is actually a defensive bowler as was seen when he was attacked by the Indian barsmen. I must confess I forgot about Syd Barnes. He was really aggressive.
Gayle and Afridi - that's not light.Steulen said:A bit light on spin bowling perhaps, but that wouldn't be too much of a problem I guess
Because the XI was supposed to be picked on attitude, and Warne is one of the most aggressive players in the world in that regard. He is a master of intimidating batsmen out and playing mindgames with them, and he owes a great deal of his success (especially in recent years with his reduced variation) to that. India are not simply 5 times as good at playing spin as every other country in the world - they had early success against Warne and never allowed him to get on top of them mentally. No other team in the world has managed this.a massive zebra said:Why are people picking Warne? The Aussie may be an aggressive batsman but he is primarily a bowler and has a strike rate of nearly 60. Even his deputy Stuart MacGill is superior in this regard.
Take Kemp out for Cairns and then I pretty much agreeSJS said:Gilchrist
Sehwag
Gayle
Pietersen
Symonds
Afridi
Flintoff
Razzaq
Kemp
Lee
Nell
I would like to fit in Murali somewhere. Spinners dont come more agressive than Murali. I would have put him in the all time team in place of Prasanna maybe.