• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the greatest cricketer out of this 13?

Who do you think is the greatest cricketer out of this 13? (Only as a Cricketer)

  • Ian Healy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • David Gower

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • Bob Simpson

    Votes: 8 30.8%
  • Learie Constantine

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Graeme Smith

    Votes: 11 42.3%
  • Bhagwat Chandrasekhar

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charlie MacCartney

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • Arthur Shrewsbury

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • John Snow

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • Bill Ponsford

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vijay Hazare

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bob Willis

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    26

sayon basak

International Debutant
Recently I've been looking at some list of greatest cricketers. Who do you think is the greatest among these cricketers?
 

kyear2

International Coach
Think I answered this recently, but between Smith and Simpson.

Smith pros
Top 3 modern opener
Slip fielding
Historic captaincy

Simpson
Underrated opener
Arguably greatest slip fielder
Useful 5th bowler

Not sure if Smith's captaincy is great or just historic, but while Smith didn't play in a difficult batting era, he did have difficult home conditions and glfaced an historic attack. He was also a very good slip fielder.

While Smith was a very good slip, Simpson may have been the greatest off all time. He was also an underrated opening batsman, if way slower than Smith but his leggies were also very useful and more tangible than Smith's captaincy.

So Simpson, by the slimest of margins.
 

peterhrt

U19 Captain
Quick Question:- Did fuller Pilch really have a FC bowling average of 1.35?
In Pilch's day scorecards often showed just the bowler's wickets, not how many runs conceded or balls bowled.

In matches now designated as first-class where more comprehensive scorecards exist, Pilch took 10 wickets for 214 runs, an average of 21.40.

In matches with no record of runs conceded, he took another 132 wickets. Runs conceded unknown. Cricinfo has misleadingly divided 192 runs conceded (not even 214 as they missed some matches) by 142 wickets to give the average of 1.35.

Fuller Pilch was not a regular bowler. The 229 first-class matches total shown on Cricinfo is correct. So he took 142 wickets in 229 games.

Pilch was regarded as the best batsman of the roundarm era, in the same way that William Beldham was seen as the best of the underarm age.
 

Top