Ian Balckwell's pretty darn good aswellgio said:It goes without saying that England's best all rounder, England's darling boy, perhaps the best all rounder in the world and definately the next Ian Botham.... Rikki Clarke!
even better than that..Clarke is the best allrounder for England since Derek Pringlegio said:It goes without saying that England's best all rounder, England's darling boy, perhaps the best all rounder in the world and definately the next Ian Botham.... Rikki Clarke!
Hit4Six said:im indian, england can talk up their flintoff, pakistan can have all the afridi's and maliks u want, jayasuriya pfffft no match for...
AJIT AGARKAR~~~~!!!!
hes on his way back and by the end of the holland cup he'll have 15 wickets at 10.96 runs and a batting average of 78 with a strike rate of 187.87 he'll show all doubters. on a side note has anyone else heard yuvraj singh being called an all rounder?nookie_lk said:why is he NOT in the side then ?
i would call Yuvraj a batter who can turn his arm over in ODI's...nothing more reallyHit4Six said:hes on his way back and by the end of the holland cup he'll have 15 wickets at 10.96 runs and a batting average of 78 with a strike rate of 187.87 he'll show all doubters. on a side note has anyone else heard yuvraj singh being called an all rounder?
Would you not agree that Flintoff would currently get in to the England team as a batter or a bowler(ankle permitting) alone? The same can not be said of KallisAnil said:not really....kallis is the best all-rounder in the world now by far....flintoff is improving by leaps and bounds, i agree...but other than these two, pollock and maybe shaoib malik, there is really no genuine all-rounder left in cricket. i don't agree with the concept of 'keepers being termed all-rounders...an all-rounder can bat, bowl and field and quality all-rounders do all those pretty well...'keepers can at best keep and bat...rather restricted compared to the range of a true all-rounder...