Why do you have so much disdain? Because he bats slow like Dravid?In tests though the answer is obvious... No matter how much disdain I have for his batting in general, Kallis is the only choice
Honestly I have no idea. I think he looks wonderfully balanced at the crease and there's nothing wrong, persay with his batting aesthetically.Why do you have so much disdain? Because he bats slow like Dravid?
Was waiting for someone to mention him. Arguably does deserve a mention alongside Nourse and Taylor and Amlayou didn't include Andy Flower
Wow, that's something, you know King Viv's first name.Dennis Lillee in his book had stated that the 3 best batsmen he bowled to was Sobers and the two Richards, Issac and Barry. He opined that Pollock was never to happy with the genuine shot pitched stuff (similar to Lara IMHO) and I have always noted that even though he had a longer test career than Richards he somehow managed to avoid most of the great fast bowlers, especially in their prime. Additionally while Barry Richards was proving himself internationally, all be it in FC cricket, Pollock plied his trade primarily at home.
So I will go with Richards, just over Pollock.
For what it's worth Lillee is not the only player to have expressed such sentiments. Both Garry Sobers and Barry Richards are on record as saying that Pollock was not entirely comfortable against short pitched fast bowling. There is no doubt, however, that both Pollock and Richards are among the greatest batsmen of all time. IMO both are comfortably ahead of Kallis, but if I had to select one it would definitely be Richards.Dennis Lillee in his book had stated that the 3 best batsmen he bowled to was Sobers and the two Richards, Issac and Barry. He opined that Pollock was never to happy with the genuine shot pitched stuff (similar to Lara IMHO) and I have always noted that even though he had a longer test career than Richards he somehow managed to avoid most of the great fast bowlers, especially in their prime. Additionally while Barry Richards was proving himself internationally, all be it in FC cricket, Pollock plied his trade primarily at home.
So I will go with Richards, just over Pollock.
He does have but you don't remember any.Honestly I have no idea. I think he looks wonderfully balanced at the crease and there's nothing wrong, persay with his batting aesthetically.
But it's just a pet peeve of mine that I reserve the high tiers of my personal ATGs for batsmen that have played loads of memorable innings. Now you'll say I haven't watched enough of SA's cricket and will point out instances where Kallis has produced monumental innings. Fair enough.
But personally I find the other great modern batsmen like Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting, Dravid, Sanga have such a glittering array of great innings, which imo Kallis doesn't have. It's entirely subjective but there you go
Never did I say Kallis isn't one of the all time great batsmen though... He is... Just nowhere near one of my favorites
It's Barry Richards for me. Kallis is arguably the greatest all rounder ever, though I believe personally it was Sobers, Amla is so beautiful to watch, his demeanor and his style is divine. Pollock is considered to be a great (and he was) but I never saw him play. Barry Richards? I felt as though I was in the presence of god when I saw him, which luckily I did a few times. Infact........oh forget it!Barry Richards - no disrespect to Kallis but he's not in the same class
He does have but you don't remember any.