• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is Australia's Greatest Captain?

Australia's Greatest Captain

  • Bradman

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Richie Benaud

    Votes: 10 37.0%
  • Ian Chappell

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Allan Border

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Mark Taylor

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • Steve Waugh

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Ricky Ponting

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Michael Clarke

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    27

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
As title suggests. Hard decision to make but interested to hear opinions, and perhaps a top three selection.

In my time of watching, Mark Taylor was the finest captain of that side. But Chappell and Benaud have strong claims, neither of them lost a series I believe. Border has two halves to his captaincy so not easy to judge him.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Unsure of the order but my top 3 would probably be Benaud, Border and Waugh, with Bradman and Ponting probably rounding out the top 5.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Probably too small a sample size (ironically given his noted girth) but Warwick Armstrong won 8/10 tests and drew the other two.

Also whitewashed England when such a thing had rarity value.

Woodfull impresses me too; maintained a stoic dignity throughout the Bodyline tour and bookended his captaincy by regaining the Ashes in England twice, which might be a unique achievement.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Probably too small a sample size (ironically given his noted girth) but Warwick Armstrong won 8/10 tests and drew the other two.

Also whitewashed England when such a thing had rarity value.

Woodfull impresses me too; maintained a stoic dignity throughout the Bodyline tour and bookended his captaincy by regaining the Ashes in England twice, which might be a unique achievement.
Good calls, and I'm sure they were both fine captains. In terms of ranking them, Armstrong did have the benefit leading a strong Australian aside against opponents who had been severely weakened by the ravages of WWI, and Woodfull benefited from Bradman scoring about a zillion runs in both series.

As for the others, Waugh suffers from 'Thora Hird Syndrome', meaning that the side he led could have been captained by TH and they'd have still been nigh on invincible. And given what followed, the fact that he never led them to a whitewash over us in our absolute dog days must be held against him. Loved Ponting and still do, due to his poor calls across the 2005 and 2009 series. But my affection for the man doesn't make him a great captain. I can't believe Clarke is even in the list; from memory three Ashes defeats, and behaved like a complete arsehole the one time he was lucky enough to have Johnson turn up. I don't really know how to rank Bradman's captaincy. He was probably perfectly fine, but everything was weighted so massively in his favour that it's hard to tell.

3rd place is between Chappell and Border. Both took over weak teams and took them to near the top of the pile. Maybe Chappell did actually take them to the top of the rankings after they won in England in 1975. I couldn't honestly say. Someone like JBMAC would be fascinating on the subject.

2nd place goes to Taylor, who definitely took them to the top of the rankings, and did so by winning in the Caribbean when that still counted for a lot.

1st place to Benaud. To take that side to number 1 and remain unbeaten during his time in charge was quite something, especially when, man-for-man, the players weren't so obviously superior to England or WI as other guys were able to benefit from.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
3rd place is between Chappell and Border. Both took over weak teams and took them to near the top of the pile. Maybe Chappell did actually take them to the top of the rankings after they won in England in 1975. I couldn't honestly say. Someone like JBMAC would be fascinating on the subject.

2nd place goes to Taylor, who definitely took them to the top of the rankings, and did so by winning in the Caribbean when that still counted for a lot.

1st place to Benaud. To take that side to number 1 and remain unbeaten during his time in charge was quite something, especially when, man-for-man, the players weren't so obviously superior to England or WI as guys were able to benefit from.

Pretty much this for me.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Good calls, and I'm sure they were both fine captains. In terms of ranking them, Armstrong did have the benefit leading a strong Australian aside against opponents who had been severely weakened by the ravages of WWI, and Woodfull benefited from Bradman scoring about a zillion runs in both series.

As for the others, Waugh suffers from 'Thora Hird Syndrome', meaning that the side he led could have been captained by TH and they'd have still been nigh on invincible. And given what followed, the fact that he never led them to a whitewash over us in our absolute dog days must be held against him. Loved Ponting and still do, due to his poor calls across the 2005 and 2009 series. But my affection for the man doesn't make him a great captain. I can't believe Clarke is even in the list; from memory three Ashes defeats, and behaved like a complete arsehole the one time he was lucky enough to have Johnson turn up. I don't really know how to rank Bradman's captaincy. He was probably perfectly fine, but everything was weighted so massively in his favour that it's hard to tell.

3rd place is between Chappell and Border. Both took over weak teams and took them to near the top of the pile. Maybe Chappell did actually take them to the top of the rankings after they won in England in 1975. I couldn't honestly say. Someone like JBMAC would be fascinating on the subject.

2nd place goes to Taylor, who definitely took them to the top of the rankings, and did so by winning in the Caribbean when that still counted for a lot.

1st place to Benaud. To take that side to number 1 and remain unbeaten during his time in charge was quite something, especially when, man-for-man, the players weren't so obviously superior to England or WI as other guys were able to benefit from.
Good list.

I find it hard to separate Chappell, Benaud and Taylor.

Chappell to me led a cricketing revolution with his aggressive style of captaincy that gave way to the modern era of the game to a certain extent.

Taylor I give credit for because though he had a great team, he managed to win series in WI, SA and Pakistan against top quality sides to become the definitive no.1. Steve Waugh by comparison faced slightly weaker opposition as captain.

Benaud I need to research more.
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
I'm in total agreement when it comes to ranking Benaud as Australia' greatest captain.

Both Border and Chappell lifted mediocre teams and I rank the former higher. Chappell had the benefit of Lillee and Thompson.

I'd give honourable mentions to Armstrong and Woodfull purely on what I have read on their record.

Taylor was a solid captain.

I never regarded Bradman as a great tactical captain. He had a powerful side and his approach seemed to be 'put our foot on their throat and keep it there'. It was an attitude in a Post WWII climate that didn't go down well with some of his team.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I'm in total agreement when it comes to ranking Benaud as Australia' greatest captain.

Both Border and Chappell lifted mediocre teams and I rank the former higher. Chappell had the benefit of Lillee and Thompson.

I'd give honourable mentions to Armstrong and Woodfull purely on what I have read on their record.

Taylor was a solid captain.

I never regarded Bradman as a great tactical captain. He had a powerful side and his approach seemed to be 'put our foot on their throat and keep it there'. It was an attitude in a Post WWII climate that didn't go down well with some of his team.
Tactically to me Taylor is perhaps the greatest captain ever. It was uncanny how many of his little plans and fielding placements seemed to work. And even gutsy calls like choosing to play with three proper bowlers plus Bevan in SA, and winning.
 
Last edited:

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Between Benaud and Taylor from that lot, and at a push I'd say Taylor marginally
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
i'm sure that burgey has absolutely nothing to say on this matter

said taylor though only on the basis of secondhand knowledge
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Benaud- was innovative and well before his time

Taylor- tactical genius

Woodfull- so dignified, refused to sully the game by using the tactics Eng used against us. Remarkably well respected by all

Chappell- union leader and gang boss.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Woodfull
Simpson
Bradman
Chappell
Ponting
Border
Gilchrist
Noble
Benaud
Lindwall
Cummins
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Lotta part-time bowlers who turn the ball from leg in that XI. Also Chappelli would be pissed off at not getting to bat 3.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Interesting to hear comments from Mike Brearely about Ian Chappell and his toughness. I think that mindset shift changed cricket from the gentleman type of game.


Another interesting clip from Chappell on Mark Taylor, especially that bit about how Taylor curbed Bob Simpson's influence. In general, Chappell didn't rate Border or Waugh that highly, putting them as too conservative.

 

Top