well richard is the man to see on this...he must have the most comprehensive archive of cricket stats and cricket footage of any 18 year on the planet....since...Bill frindell was 18 years old.Mr Mxyzptlk said:They will be nearly impossible to calculate as they aren't acknowledged by the ICC nor the game itself, therefore it would require watching of documented footage, reading of reports (in hope that they are detailed and accurate) and a strong matter of opinion.
Basically, they don't exist except in the minds of a few.
So high?Langeveldt said:I know that Bradman would have averaged 68 in tests if every chance off him had been held...
But do you know how many chances he gave?Langeveldt said:I know that Bradman would have averaged 68 in tests if every chance off him had been held...
Mr Mxyzptlk said:Basically, they don't exist except in the minds of a few.
Keep in mind that there are billions of people in this world.age_master said:a few??? :O :O :O
who apart from Richard???
Well Richard Dickinson needs to bloody show me because all he has done is TALK TALK TALK.Craig said:You will be surprised Mingster.
Swervy said:well Richard either chose to not reply to this thread, or he is busy getting the 'averages' together..i hope its the latter
Exactly. I tried explaining that to him but it didn't go through. The definition of a chance varies, and one's opinion of what a chance is doesn't make it true.Raj123 said:I dont see how any one can come up with the stats... There are so many aspects to consider.
Theres missed runouts, missed stumpings, bad umpiring and of course missed catches(and if you have two fielders like a nehra or a ponting, the same stroke could be clean stroke for the first and a possible missed chance for the latter)