DrWolverine
International Regular
Rank them
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Walsh. Pollock. Waqar.
- Thread starter DrWolverine
- Start date
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Waqar is first for being the most lethal.
I have recently gone for Pollock over Walsh. Just based on being worldclass for longer.
I have recently gone for Pollock over Walsh. Just based on being worldclass for longer.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Was a Waqar > Pollock > Walsh guy for the longest, but have started to rate Pollock a lot higher than I used to.
Will go for Pollock > Waqar > Walsh now
Will go for Pollock > Waqar > Walsh now
shortpitched713
Cricketer Of The Year
Pollock is the best of these three. But this is definitely weaker as a trio, I'd say.
DrWolverine
International Regular
Waqar vs Walsh is as different as one can get.
Waqar had a great peak but sucked post peak.
Walsh never reached the highs but had longevity.
Waqar had a great peak but sucked post peak.
Walsh never reached the highs but had longevity.
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
To be fair to Walsh he did have a worldclass peak from 97 onwards. But overall I think Waqar was more lethal.