I believe it might be 'allowed', but obviously its not allowed.steds said:I don't think you're aloud to say that.
Do you want to get banned?![]()
***ual fustration can be a horrible thingkenway said:Hu Thinks That He Mods Of This Site Are W A N K E R S ??
I Think They All Maggie Thatcher Brigade A S S H O L E S
They are always closed for a reason.ReallyCrazy said:I don't want to call any names...but I do think that the mods are not doing a good job. They seem to close any thread which they don't like.
So it had nothing to do with preventing a flame war from the extremely abusive post then?ReallyCrazy said:For example, my thread "Ganguly's achievements" was closed for no reason just because one of the mods felt he'd had enough.
There was plenty of reason - duplicate thread for one thing!ReallyCrazy said:Another thread which was closed for no reason was the "Warne and Murali issue" thread.
Yeah they were always closed for a reason. The reason being, Moderator Mr. X did not like so and so topic. It didn't matter what others felt.marc71178 said:They are always closed for a reason.
There was just one extremely abusive post. No need to close an entire thread because of that. That particular post could have been deleted.So it had nothing to do with preventing a flame war from the extremely abusive post then?
It was not a duplicate thread. It was not discussing who was better between Murali and Warne. Instead, it was a discussion on the basis/criteria for selection of Warne over Murali.There was plenty of reason - duplicate thread for one thing!
And racism another.
Erm no, there's more to it than that.ReallyCrazy said:Yeah they were always closed for a reason. The reason being, Moderator Mr. X did not like so and so topic. It didn't matter what others felt.
And you think it would stop at one post from that member?ReallyCrazy said:There was just one extremely abusive post. No need to close an entire thread because of that. That particular post could have been deleted.
ReallyCrazy said:It was not a duplicate thread. It was not discussing who was better between Murali and Warne. Instead, it was a discussion on the basis/criteria for selection of Warne over Murali.
What, moderators doing their jobs?a massive zebra said:Yes ReallyCrazy I also find it frustrating.