PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Two batsmen that opposition feared
PC doesn't miss such things. Atleast now we can leave the Hobbs vs Tendulkar Thread for Hobbs and Tendulkar.
Why is Smith arguable? He is clearly the best bat of his era without competition without any major flaw in his record.Well as I said in the other thread.
I have Richards in that elite best after Bradman tier, I don't quite have Sunny up there.
Sachin, Sobers, Viv, Hobbs and arguably Smith, Lara and Hutton.
Have Sunny just outside of that group and closer to the guys behind.
I sincerely don't think that people get how special Viv Richards was.The following have been named by fellow players (and an umpire) as the best batsman they have seen. Since 1945 only. Additional names/nominators welcome.
Viv Richards: Botham, Robin Smith, Thorpe, Willis, Merv Hughes, Dujon, Hunte, Marshall, Richie Richardson, Roberts, Shastri, Vengsarkar, Saeed Anwar, Imran, Inzamam, Mohd Yousuf, Zaheer Abbas, Aravinda de Silva
Tendulkar: Harvey, Hayden, Warne, Donald, Hadlee, Kapil Dev, Hanif, Qadir, Muralitharan, Flower
Hutton: Appleyard, Cowdrey, John Edrich, Graveney, Trueman, Waite, Ramadhin
Barry Richards: Gooch, Bob Taylor, Dicky Bird, Lillee, Graham McKenzie, Graeme Pollock, Procter
Sobers: Illingworth, Underwood, Greg Chappell, Walters
Gavaskar: Hutton, Asif Iqbal, Mudassar Nazar
Lara: Alec Stewart, Herschelle Gibbs, Wasim Akram
Greg Chappell: Thomson
Harvey: Davidson
Weekes: Sobers
I haven't. I said arguable. If he goes though, so does BCL.Why is Smith arguable? He is clearly the best bat of his era without competition without any major flaw in his record.
To me I put him in the first tier. Strange how CW has soured on him.
your rationale for why it’s not close? Gavaskar opened and had the higher average and didn’t have to face to the Windies.You always have the dumbest votes @PlayerComparisons
ridiculous false precision to suit your prejudicesWell as I said in the other thread.
I have Richards in that elite best after Bradman tier, I don't quite have Sunny up there.
Sachin, Sobers, Viv, Hobbs and arguably Smith, Lara and Hutton.
Have Sunny just outside of that group and closer to the guys behind.
ridiculous false precision to suit your prejudicesWhy is Smith arguable? He is clearly the best bat of his era without competition without any major flaw in his record.
To me I put him in the first tier. Strange how CW has soured on him.
I think Viv's away record is a lot better when it comes to batting against ATG pacers, and think Sunny had some visible flaws against pace. btw my vote of it not being close isn't on their output but moreso on their placement in my all time top 25 batters, I've Viv in top 5 and Gavaskar in top 15your rationale for why it’s not close? Gavaskar opened and had the higher average and didn’t have to face to the Windies.
They aren't for me. Smith has virtually no flaw in his record.I haven't. I said arguable. If he goes though, so does BCL.
Those two guys are dead even for me.
It is largely due to his style of playI sincerely don't think that people get how special Viv Richards was.
and being the greatest player of fast bowling of all time.It is largely due to his style of play