• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv Richards vs Shaun Pollock

Viv vs Pollock


  • Total voters
    15

DrWolverine

International Regular
20 years from now, he won’t even make it to Top 15.

Fifty years after your retire, you are just a number.

None of us have watched Sutcliffe or Barnes play.
Sutcliffe is relevant today because of his 60+ average.
Barnes is relevant today because of God like numbers.
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
20 years from now, fans who saw him play would no longer be alive or they won’t use the internet.

The younger fans would dissect the numbers. As great as Viv Richards is, there are some visible flaws on his record at least when you look at it superficially.
 

DrWolverine

International Regular
Joe Root?

He would end up with the most runs and maybe most centuries as well. Also, from statistical point of view no obvious flaw except his record against Aus
 

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
20 years from now, fans who saw him play would no longer be alive or they won’t use the internet.

The younger fans would dissect the numbers. As great as Viv Richards is, there are some visible flaws on his record at least when you look at it superficially.
If he averaged 0.25 points lower, he might have already been rated below Dravid and Miandad
 

Top