DrWolverine
International Debutant
Primary discipline in test cricket
In my opinion no but yeah it’s quite closeLara is closer to Viv than Donald is to Ambrose imo.
Viv>Lara
Ambrose>Donald
very hard.
Lara is closer to Viv than Donald is to Ambrose imo.
Lara>VivIn my opinion no but yeah it’s quite close
I don't know if there's any situation where I'd take Lara over Viv bar a road or a rank turner.Lara>Viv
You just gave 2 vert common situations dude.....I don't know if there's any situation where I'd take Lara over Viv bar a road or a rank turner.
Yeah but I rate roads runs as lesser, and Viv on any high bounce, uneven bounce, greentop or seamy surface.You just gave 2 vert common situations dude.....
Donald & Richards would not suck against IndiaLara and Ambrose. They are the same team. And they don't suck against Australia.
Ok but collectively Lara and Ambrose have three tests in India.Donald & Richards would not suck against India
Viv (WSC included)give Viv his WSC runs against Aus
Aus matters moreViv vs Aus : 2266 runs @ 44 in 34 Tests and 5 tons
Lara vs Ind : 1002 runs in 17 Tests @ 34 and 2 tons
Donald vs Aus : 53 wkts in 14 Tests @ 31 and 2 5-Fers
Curtly vs Ind : 15 wkts in 9 Tests @ 38 and 1 5-Fer
I was checking their overall records.give Viv his WSC runs against Aus
WSC or not, no potential weakness in Viv’s recordViv (WSC included)
vs Australia: 3,504 @ 48.66, 9 tons in 77 innings.
in Australia: 2,998 @ 51.68, 8 tons in 62 innings.
1. Don’t really agreeAus matters more
Aus was the ultimate challenge home and away in the 90s and 2000s. Donald was below par in 5/6 series against them. Ambrose was awesome.1. Don’t really agree
2. I don’t really see an argument for Lara over Viv
3. Ambrose has more holes in his record than Donald
Better against spin but Viv is better against pace by a larger margin imo.2. I don’t really see an argument for Lara over Viv