Virat Kohli vs Inzamam ul Haq

[PlayerComparisons]

Two players that underachieved

 

[Johan]

I think Cook is better than Inzamam and don't really think Kohli has declined enough for me to put him below Cook honestly.

 

[Coronis]

Inzamam is another who greatly benefited by playing in the 00’s vs 90’s.

90’s
58 matches 97 innings 3717 @ 43.22 8 tons
00’s
62 matches 103 innings 5113 @ 55.57 17 tons

 

[sayon basak]

Inzamam is another who greatly benefited by playing in the 00’s vs 90’s.

90’s
58 matches 97 innings 3717 @ 43.22 8 tons
00’s
62 matches 103 innings 5113 @ 55.57 17 tons

Chanderpaul:-
90's
37 matches 62 innings 2234 @40.61 2 tons
00's
86 matches 148 innings 6435 @52.31 19 tons

 

[Coronis]

Chanderpaul:-
90's
37 matches 62 innings 2234 @40.61 2 tons
00's
86 matches 148 innings 6435 @52.31 19 tons

2010’s
41 matches 70 innings 3198 @ 60.33 9 tons

 

[Randomfan]

Inzamam is another who greatly benefited by playing in the 00’s vs 90’s.

90’s
58 matches 97 innings 3717 @ 43.22 8 tons
00’s
62 matches 103 innings 5113 @ 55.57 17 tons

Despite those benefits, he couldn't score against two best teams of his era, Aus and SA. Not just in Aus/SA, but even at home against them.



Inzzy some how always found a way to get out against SA and Aus no matter where the game was played. Just 1 ton. If it was only away then I would think bounce was the reason but it was at all venues so not sure.

 

[subshakerz]

Kohli but Inzi if Kohli fails again in England.