Samuel_Vimes said:
60-40 England for me. If McGrath, Gillespie and Kasprowicz can't get them out, I struggle to see how Collymore (the only one at their level IMO), Bradshaw and Bravo can - but then again, they just did it three months ago.
(Halsey to say it's 110-negative 10 England in 5...4...3...)
If Collymore bowled like he did today, he'll take wickets.
If Bravo bowls like he has almost all year, he'll take wickets.
Bradshaw's job isn't to take wickets as far as I'm concerned.
If Gayle bowls like he typically does, he'll take wickets.
If Dillon is fully fit and plays, he may take wickets. I didn't see his Bangladesh demolition and haven't seen him bowl since Eng/WI in the Caribbean earlier this year, so I don't know what sort of form he's in.
If the West Indies field like they have against South Africa and Pakistan, they'll take wickets.
Many many ifs.
Basically I'd say that if the West Indies play like they have in the Champions Trophy so far, they likely will win. They've shown enthusiasm, guts and pure talent, which is so refreshing because it's only been 1 of the 3 in the past. I'm not saying that they've 'turned the corner', as I am well aware of the problems at the basic level of West Indies cricket, but I do think that people should give them more credit than they've gotten so far. At the moment the West Indies are playing better than I've seen them play over a series of matches since Pakistan and Zimbabwe toured the Caribbean in 2000.