• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ten Most Important Numbers in Cricket

Sehwag309

Banned
LINK

1. 99.94

Don Bradman strode to the wicket at the Oval in 1948 for his last Test innings needing four runs to leave him with a career average of 100. That he fell so tantalisingly short – bowled second ball for a duck – was instantly the stuff of legend, but it failed to stop his average becoming a totemic figure in Australian sport.

Charles Moses, general manager of the ABC for three decades, enshrined the figure in the Australian psyche with his suggestion to include it in the national broadcaster's postal address, which became P.O. Box 9994 in every state capital.

2. 334

Bradman's highest Test score, recognisable to the most casual Australian cricket follower, was compiled at Headingley during his phenomenal Ashes tour in 1930. A few weeks short of his 22nd birthday, Bradman came to the wicket in the second over of the match. By the end of the opening day, he was on 309. His dismissal the next morning heralded a record that would be unthreatened for almost seven decades.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

In 1998, at Peshawar in Pakistan, Mark Taylor declared the Australian innings when he was on 334 because he was unwilling to outshine the Don.

3. 501

Brian Lara compiled his unbeaten 501 during a purple patch that only Bradman has matched. Just weeks after posting the then highest Test score, with 375 against England at Antigua, Lara flayed the Durham attack while playing for Warwickshire at Edgbaston. His innings surpassed the 499 that Hanif Mohammad had made for Karachi in 1958 before being run out – attempting a two from the penultimate delivery before stumps. (A mix-up by the scoreboard operators meant that Mohammed thought he was on 496, instead of 498: "I decided to take a couple of twos if a boundary wasn't possible. Had the correct score been shown, I would have planned differently ... I was very upset.")

4. 87

The superstition about Australia' unlucky number supposedly began with Keith Miller, who – aged 10 – went to the MCG to watch Bradman bat for NSW against Victoria during the 1929-30 season. The young Miller's hopes that Bradman would score a ton were dashed when Harry "Bull" Alexander bowled him; in Miller's memory, the Don was on 87, an unlucky 13 runs short of a century.

When Miller began playing district cricket with South Melbourne, he was fielding alongside Ian Johnson in the slips when he commented that many batsmen seemed to be dismissed on 87. In years to come, while playing for Victoria and Australia, Miller and Johnson would nudge each other when a batsman or the team reached that figure.

Richie Benaud later picked up on it and the myth grew. The fact that, all those years ago, the Don had been bowled by the Bull for 89 seemed to make no impact. England's unlucky number, 111, was inspired by Admiral Lord Nelson, an English military hero who, when he died in 1805, was said to have had one eye, one arm and one leg. Umpire David Shepherd acknowledges scores of 111 with a low hop on one leg.

5. 45

Cricket's reputation as the ultimate game for figures received a glorious fillip in 1977 when Australia won the Centenary Test against England at the MCG by 45 runs, the precise margin by which the Australians had won the first Test a century earlier.

For fans prone to poring over exercise books, the 1977 celebratory Test was a colossus, yielding some of the most cherished figures in the game. Besides the winning margin, Derek Randall made 174 on debut and David Hookes struck five consecutive fours off Tony Greig.

6. 16

The West Indies' record of 11 consecutive Test victories, compiled under Clive Lloyd before coming to end in 1984, was eclipsed by the Australians under Steve Waugh. From October 1999 in Harare to March 2001 in Kolkata, the Australians pushed the record out to 16 before V.V.S. Laxman inspired India to victory with an innings of 281, a figure that itself has become totemic.

7. 43

On the flipside of batting excellence, Courtney Walsh's 43 Test ducks is a record that should take some beating. Immediately below him is Shane Warne, on 30, and Glenn McGrath, whose swashbuckling half-century against the Kiwis last weekend was an entertaining distraction from the fact that he has scored a doughnut on 29 occasions.

8. 229

Until January 2003, the lowest individual score never made in Test cricket was 228. That changed when South African opening batsman Herschelle Gibbs made 228 during a Test against Pakistan in Cape Town. Now, the lowest score never achieved in Test cricket is 229.

9. 356

Michael Slater was so happy with receiving Australia's Test cap No.356 that he got a tattoo of the number, as well as a personalised number plate (MS356) for his new red Ferrari. His pride later turned to horror when he learned that Brendon Julian, who made his debut in the same Test at Old Trafford in 1993, should have been ahead of him on account of alphabetical precedence (as opposed to batting order).

Australian authorities let Slater keep his cap – and tattoo – but ruled that, in future, if more than one player were to make their debuts in the same Test, alphabetical precedence would determine the order of caps.

10. 36

According to James Grant in The Longest Game, Melbourne University batsman Ian Dunne was annoyed at losing his wicket to a rash stroke on 36 during a district cricket match in the 1970s. His response was to hurl his bat against the dressing-room wall and declare: "That was a scum shot."

Before long, not only had Dunne earned the nickname Scum, but mathematicians in the team had begun referring to scores of 36 as "scum". At 18, a batsman was on half-scum. On 72, his score was twoscum, and so on.

The practice circulated throughout Melbourne district ranks, with fractions and multiples of 36 earning much comment. During the 1977-78 Ashes series, which featured two former Melbourne University players in Jim Higgs and Ian Botham, the "Scum phenomenon" achieved new heights when Australia was six for 36 in the first innings before recovering to make 116, thanks to Rodney Hogg's top score of 36. Of course, there were 36 extras. During the next Test, Hogg made 18 and Bob Willis took one for 36. Scum fractions and multiples kept popping up until late in the series, by when 48 was beginning to make its presence felt
 

Sudeep

International Captain
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Even there they mentioned Bradman. My theory is the Aussies wish they had Lara. :cool:
My theory is every cricketing side in this world wish they had Lara.
 

Sudeep

International Captain
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
I bet the West Indies don't. Word is they've signed him already.
He hasn't signed on the Digicel contract, which the WICB seems to be in love with... :p
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Some very prominent non-Australian landmark numbers :p

19 : The number of wickets taken by the Englishman Laker in a test ! Theoretically possible but unlikely to ever be overtaken.

36 The number of runs scored by West Indian Sobers and Indian Shastri in an over. The maximum possible of all legitimate deliveries.

197. The number of first class centuries scored by the Englishman Hobbs. Extremely unlikely to be overtaken.

49 The number of wickets taken by Englishman Barnes in four test matches in a series !

PS : And a very important Australian number !!

4 : The number of runs Bradman needed to score in his last test innings to have a three-digit batting average and the number of runs by which he failed to reach this meagre objective :p

Just kidding. Dont flare up :)
 
Last edited:

ijaz

Cricket Spectator
I think every team in the world would like a player who averages 99 in test matches not someone who can make a big score every now and then..
 

Deja moo

International Captain
Meh.....The ten most important numbers in cricket are and always will be :

0 (ducks) , 5(wkts in an innings) ,10(wkts in a test or innings) ,20( wkts to win a test match), 50(runs,wkts,matches,whatever) ,99(heartbreak score) ,99.94(no explanation needed),100(no explanation needed) ,200(follow on),and whatever number happens to be your lucky one.

Elementary. All other lists can take a hike .
 

Loony BoB

International Captain
If you were really into your cricket, you'd have the Eleven Most Important Numbers in Cricket. ;)

My top 11 numbers in cricket...

1. 11 - The number of players per side in a game of cricket. 11 is the only number I know that reminds me of cricket wherever it is used. If I look at a roadmap, for example, that lists 11 miles as the distance between two points, I'd think "cricket!"
2. 6 - For two big and obvious reasons. 6 is the big hit boundary and 6 is also the number of legitimate balls bowled per over.
3. 50 - Overs in an ODI, as well as the batting milestone and also what is fast becoming the benchmark average for a world-class batsman in today's OD game.
3. 501 - As stated above.
4. 400* - The highest score ever achieved in test cricket.
5. 99.94 - As stated above.
6. 10 - The number of wickets one needs to bowl a side out, also for ten-wicket-hauls in test cricket.
7. 100 - The century.
8. 5 - The five wicket bag.
9. 4 - The lesser boundary.
10. 300 - Legitimate deliveries in an ODI innings.
11. 0 - Duck.
12th Number: 12 ;)

Unlucky number to miss out: 36, as in the post by SJS.

Most of those other numbers like 45 and so on mean little to me. Maybe to a cricket historian they're important, but to the game itself, in my opinion, they're not.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Loony BoB said:
If you were really into your cricket, you'd have the Eleven Most Important Numbers in Cricket. ;)

My top 11 numbers in cricket...

1. 11 - The number of players per side in a game of cricket. 11 is the only number I know that reminds me of cricket wherever it is used. If I look at a roadmap, for example, that lists 11 miles as the distance between two points, I'd think "cricket!"
2. 6 - For two big and obvious reasons. 6 is the big hit boundary and 6 is also the number of legitimate balls bowled per over.
3. 50 - Overs in an ODI, as well as the batting milestone and also what is fast becoming the benchmark average for a world-class batsman in today's OD game.
3. 501 - As stated above.
4. 400* - The highest score ever achieved in test cricket.
5. 99.94 - As stated above.
6. 10 - The number of wickets one needs to bowl a side out, also for ten-wicket-hauls in test cricket.
7. 100 - The century.
8. 5 - The five wicket bag.
9. 4 - The lesser boundary.
10. 300 - Legitimate deliveries in an ODI innings.
11. 0 - Duck.
12th Number: 12 ;)

Unlucky number to miss out: 36, as in the post by SJS.

Most of those other numbers like 45 and so on mean little to me. Maybe to a cricket historian they're important, but to the game itself, in my opinion, they're not.
I wish to add one more ..

401 !!

The number of runs I would like some Indian batsman to score in a test innings one day .... but before someone else does it :p

PS: Oh and five more :p

1 ...The number of world class all rounders I wish India had :mellow:

2 ...The number of world class test openers I wish India had :mellow:

3 ... The number of world class genuine FAST bowlers I wish India had :mellow:

4 ... The number of sincere selectors I wish India had :mellow:

5 ... The number of grounds with world class facilities for players AND spectators that I wish India had :mellow:
 
Last edited:

Top