• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

T20 Champions League - Might be making a comeback

chris.hinton

International Captain
Ten years after its previous edition, "active conversations" are on between the cricket boards of Australia, England and India to revive the Champions League T20 (CLT20) tournament. This comes from Cricket Victoria CEO Nick Cummins, who also said the biggest challenge would be to find a window in the jampacked cricket calendar for the tournament.




"I think the Champions League was ahead of its time. The T20 landscape wasn't mature enough at that point. I think it is now," Cummins said on the sidelines of an event in Mumbai on Tuesday. "I know that there's active conversations between Cricket Australia, the ECB, and the BCCI about the Champions League.




"It's just trying to find a window as to when you actually play that, because you've also got all the ICC tournaments as well. It may be that the first iteration of the Champions League will be of the women… [it may involve cricketers playing in] the WPL, the Hundred and the WBBL."



The last edition of the CLT20 was held in India in 2014, with Chennai Super Kings (CSK) winning the title after defeating Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) in the final in Bengaluru. That edition of the tournament, then in its sixth year, involved three teams from India, two each from Australia and South Africa, and one each from Pakistan, the West Indies and New Zealand.




The tournament was played annually from 2009 to 2014, four times in India and twice in South Africa. The tournament was won twice each by CSK and Mumbai Indians (MI), and once each by New South Wales and Sydney Sixers.




Cummins said he had been in talks with Cricket Australia CEO Nick Hockley for the revival of the CLT20, and that BCCI secretary Jay Shah might be in a position to shed more light on the topic.




"I'm constantly talking to Nick Hockley, Cricket Australia CEO, for a Champions League, because I think it's pretty important to bring that back," Cummins said. "There are talks about it. It's probably a question to ask Jay Shah. But certainly, from an Australia cricket perspective, we are very open to the idea of the Champions League. It's just about finding a window in the FTP, but I think that's the next step in the evolution of cricket."




Cummins drew comparisons with the club-based Champions League in football, saying that cricket needed to find a similar balance between international- and club-based competitions.


"No other competition has Indian players. The IPL doesn't have Pakistan players. So there is no competition in the world with the best players. The Champions League would be a way for the best to be playing against each other"
Cricket Victoria CEO Nick Cummins

"We still haven't made out which league is the best. IPL, PSL or the Big Bash? The only way we can show that is by having Melbourne Stars play Karachi Kings or Mumbai Indians," Cummins said. "Champions League is well overdue. Look at what Champions League does for football, the World Cup is fantastic and the Champions League is there [too] every time.





"The idea of Mumbai Indians playing Melbourne Stars at the MCG would be just as exciting as India playing Australia at the MCG.




"Football had a really big club vs country tension in the 90s. And they found a way for international football to exist side by side with leagues. Cricket is going through it at the moment. Every country has the right to have a T20 league, whether it is Nepal or Ireland. We shouldn't place controls on how members want to play cricket.




"The reality is there is no T20 competition in the world which has the best players in the world playing in it. Champions League would actually provide that. No other competition has Indian players. The IPL doesn't have Pakistan players. So there is no competition in the world with the best players. The Champions League would be a way for the best to be playing against each other."
 

chris.hinton

International Captain
Would be interesting and it would be needed. But it could lead to a pathway of a World League which would really change a lot of things for Cricket and its future.
 
If a player is part of team A and was also a part of team B's championship title in their domestic tournament...will the player be allowed to play for both teams provided that it is not Team A vs Team B?

I would love to see this

/s
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
If a player is part of team A and was also a part of team B's championship title in their domestic tournament...will the player be allowed to play for both teams provided that it is not Team A vs Team B?

I would love to see this

/s
imagine Rashid Khan playing every day and having practice sessions on his plane journeys between stadiums
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Stupid idea when certain players are bound to be in multiple teams. Something that the calendar really doesn’t need.

Edit: no link to the article. Was it published on the 1st April?
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
i love the champions league concept but the last thing the calendar needs is more t20. if we didn't have all that goofy stuff like the hundred and t10 leagues and the fact that every country has a t20 league now there would be space but there's just not imho
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If a player is part of team A and was also a part of team B's championship title in their domestic tournament...will the player be allowed to play for both teams provided that it is not Team A vs Team B?

I would love to see this

/s
This happened the first time they did that. It was one of the multitude factors rigged to help the IPL teams win, IIRC basically if they played for an IPL franchise that was in the tournament (which was made up of 3 or 4 IPL teams and 1 or 2 from the other tournaments) they had to play for that team and not any of the others, even if it was their actual home team
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
This happened the first time they did that. It was one of the multitude factors rigged to help the IPL teams win, IIRC basically if they played for an IPL franchise that was in the tournament (which was made up of 3 or 4 IPL teams and 1 or 2 from the other tournaments) they had to play for that team and not any of the others, even if it was their actual home team
it was like that in one edition but later on they allowed players to choose who they wanted to play for

so naturally they chose the ipl teams who paid them extra moolah
 

RMBolton

U19 Debutant
Terrible idea. They haven't fixed the problems from the original, & if it's a Big 3 money grab it'll be even worse. At least the original had CSA involved.
The two main areas of concern for me are player eligibility for those with multiple teams in the league & ensuring a fair qualification system.

I'm not optimistic, though. The rumblings about a women's CLT20 lay it bare as a Big 3 stitchup, with only teams from the WBBL, WPL & Hundred. 🤢🤮
 

Top