that's the option for bitches who need a copout
I'd put Holding in that category as well. The only thing he's really lacking is longevity and therefore lack of wickets.Steyn. I rate Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn and Imran as better than Warne Murali as the pacers were all condition bowlers along with the general higher level of penetration that pacers have.
Yeah that's a big thing to lack if your opponent has 700 wickets though. Tho I agree he likely is that class of bowler had he played more.I'd put Holding in that category as well. The only thing he's really lacking is longevity and therefore lack of wickets.
........that's the option for bitches who need a copout
The argument is to objectively look at their records. Rather than automatically going to the mindless pacers > spinnersWhat exactly is the argument for Warne here?
What is Warne big advantage as far as record goes with Steyn?The argument is to objectively look at their records. Rather than automatically going to the mindless pacers > spinners
Australian.What is Warne big advantage as far as record goes with Steyn?
I don't think so, considering the love affairs with Australian players (and stats) in here and elsewhere.Agreed.