Have to laugh when people use that to judge Tendy/Ponting... average of 51 against top sides after playing for 2 decades, after playing numerous great attacks in the 90s like they did is stunning.I thought Ponting crapped on his record towards the end but Tendulkar is just as bad. Right now, minnows removed, Tendulkar averages 51.50 - about 0.4 runs more than Ponting.
Pretty sure you're the same bloke who said Ponting went too early.I thought Ponting crapped on his record towards the end but Tendulkar is just as bad. Right now, minnows removed, Tendulkar averages 51.50 - about 0.4 runs more than Ponting.
True, but it shows that someone like Viv who was barely over 50 and never played the minnow of his time (SL) actually has a very good record (its often criticised for not being higher), despite also having a bad trough towards the end.Have to laugh when people use that to judge Tendy/Ponting... average of 51 against top sides after playing for 2 decades, after playing numerous great attacks in the 90s like they did is stunning.
Pontings slump lasted almost 3 n 1/2 years though, thats the problem... hope tendulkar doesnt stick around that long
I don't get it, what does that have to do with this?Pretty sure you're the same bloke who said Ponting went too early.
This is disgusting behaviour, posting such drivel in Sachin's retirement thread
Absolutely no say of ours when he should retire. What should happen is for him to be dropped if he's not good enough.He should but he won't.
In principle I agree. With Sachin though, you have to wonder whether he has a certain duty to do the right thing given the public uproar that would seemingly greet him being dropped. I dunno.Absolutely no say of ours when he should retire. What should happen is for him to be dropped if he's not good enough.
Honestly hope he plays on for as long as he wants. It's not his responsibility and he doesn't deserve to have to end his own career just because the selectors don't have any guts.
Macca should have retired a long time ago, he's embarrassing to watch.In principle I agree. With Sachin though, you have to wonder whether he has a certain duty to do the right thing given the public uproar that would seemingly greet him being dropped. I dunno.
Aside from that, as I said in another thread, is there someone who will come in and be a better option? Again, I don't follow Indian cricket enough to know but if him being replaced wont improve the side then my first point is irrelevant anyway.
I cringed reading a stack of people saying Paul McCartney should retire because he clearly still loves performing. If nobody wanted to watch him then he's have no audience to perform to anyway. I mean its a bit different because I saw Macca live a year ago and it was absolutely exceptional, but the point for me is that if someone loves doing something then why would they choose to jack it in? If others decide you're no longer good enough then so be it but if you're wanted and you want to do it, why stop?
All I'd say is that if the selectors do decide its time, they should ask him if he'll come out and say it's his decision. That would be a satisfactory way of getting around what I said in my first paragraph, but I don't know how feasible it is, all in all.