I think it will be a bit hard as I have given in 2 lists of 30, and I'm number 24 on the draft order.marc71178 said:It's better to submit one big list I think.
For example Rik, what if all your Round 6 picks are taken in Round 5 and before your Round 6 pick?
That makes no sense!Rik said:I think it will be a bit hard as I have given in 2 lists of 30, and I'm number 24 on the draft order.
I also compiled 2 totally different lists for the 2 rounds, so if your scenario came true I would still get a player. Giving one big list means that I might end up with 2 keepers from my 1st list when I want a keeper from my 1st and a batsman/bowler from my 2nd list which would be near the end if I used one list...
It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.Neil Pickup said:That makes no sense!
Round 6 list of 30. There are 52 other picks before you (29+23) so it could easily be exhausted.
How does this stop you getting two keepers, if the players before the keeper in List 5 are taken, and then the ones before the other keeper in List 6 are taken?
Just specify that you don't want some combinations with stars or something.
Makes sense to me, because it's exactly what I did...Rik said:It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.
This is exactly what I did but I'm one of the first people to pick so it doesn't really matter!!Rik said:It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.