• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Round 5 & 6 Draft Lists recieved

bugssy

Cricketer Of The Year
is there a revised list or do i need to take the players names out. can u please advise

oh blewy see you about 1.30pm.k
 

Graham

3rd Umpire
There is no revised list - you just print off the previous ones and cross out the players already taken.
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
I've sent mine in as 2 seperate lists, one for 5 and one for 6. Can you confirm this is acceptable and that you have recieved them GB?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
It's better to submit one big list I think.

For example Rik, what if all your Round 6 picks are taken in Round 5 and before your Round 6 pick?
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
marc71178 said:
It's better to submit one big list I think.

For example Rik, what if all your Round 6 picks are taken in Round 5 and before your Round 6 pick?
I think it will be a bit hard as I have given in 2 lists of 30, and I'm number 24 on the draft order.

I also compiled 2 totally different lists for the 2 rounds, so if your scenario came true I would still get a player. Giving one big list means that I might end up with 2 keepers from my 1st list when I want a keeper from my 1st and a batsman/bowler from my 2nd list which would be near the end if I used one list...
 
Last edited:

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Rik said:
I think it will be a bit hard as I have given in 2 lists of 30, and I'm number 24 on the draft order.

I also compiled 2 totally different lists for the 2 rounds, so if your scenario came true I would still get a player. Giving one big list means that I might end up with 2 keepers from my 1st list when I want a keeper from my 1st and a batsman/bowler from my 2nd list which would be near the end if I used one list...
That makes no sense!

Round 6 list of 30. There are 52 other picks before you (29+23) so it could easily be exhausted.

How does this stop you getting two keepers, if the players before the keeper in List 5 are taken, and then the ones before the other keeper in List 6 are taken?

Just specify that you don't want some combinations with stars or something.
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Neil Pickup said:
That makes no sense!

Round 6 list of 30. There are 52 other picks before you (29+23) so it could easily be exhausted.

How does this stop you getting two keepers, if the players before the keeper in List 5 are taken, and then the ones before the other keeper in List 6 are taken?

Just specify that you don't want some combinations with stars or something.
It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.
 

nibbs

International Captain
Rik said:
It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.
Makes sense to me, because it's exactly what I did...
 

Eyes_Only

International Debutant
Rik said:
It makes perfect sense, I wanted 2 different lists of players for the 2 rounds so I got different players, round 5 my list contained keepers, my round 6 one contained OD all-rounders. I didn't pick anyone in the same list and there are plenty of players. In the very unlikely chance that everyone I picked in round 6 is taken then I'll get a random player but that's not really a worry for me as there are hardly any players left anyway.
This is exactly what I did but I'm one of the first people to pick so it doesn't really matter!!
 

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
Lists recieved so far....

Colts
Mashonaland
ACT
Warwicks
QLD
Surrey
Auckland
ND
Victoria
SA
Lancs
Tassie
Leics
Jamaica


Those who haven't got them in yet you have till Midnight Sunday Aussie time...
 

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
I haven't checked for a couple of days due to working night shifts and sleeping during the day... im sure if you sent it, it'll be there...
 

Top