• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Rahul Dravid vs Denis Compton

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    12

Johan

International Captain
Barrington is closer to Dravid that he is to Compton imo, but fine ranking.
Nah, Barrington is better in Australia (though Compton is no chump there) and in South Africa but Compton is far better in England (where they'd play 50% of their games) and better in West Indies, so about even, I'd give to Barrington because Compton messed it up in South Africa but definitely closer to Compton than to Rahul in term of skill, just for reference.

Runs in England and West Indies:
Compton:
4,311 @ 59.05
Barrington: 4,055 @ 49.45

why does this matter? because Compton player 63% of his innings in England/West Indies while Barrington around 68% in these countries, so logically if they played together, Compton would outperform Barrington for 2/3 of his career, he'd be outperformed in Australia but I reckon Compton would perform well against the diminished 60s attacks from the Invicibles attack, it leaves India and Pakistan where it's impossible to say how Compton would do in internationals, and obviously South Africa, simply put, if they played together then there's very high probability that Compton would be viewed as the greater of the two Batsmen.

Compton also has a 20 year long career, Barrington has 10 years.

honestly, Compton over Barrington wouldn't be outrageous
 
Last edited:

Top