Just give Barnes his own category really. May be with Sobers bowling as well. For Barnes he pretty much bowled what Bedser did but with Off Breaks and Leg Break bowled with pretty much similar action. Slower than Bedser, Around 115 kmph for my best guess. Just the different words used back then to now that make it seem confusing.There's conflicting accounts of what style of bowling Barnes can even be classified into.
You aren’t gonna disagree with The Great Herbert Sutcliffe right?Well if Sutcliffe said it I have to agree at this point right?
Having closely observed his entire career, Laxman is an excellent choice for this discussion. While there have been instances where he appeared to struggle on absolute roads, he has consistently done well in challenging conditions, especially when it mattered the most. In terms of clutch innings, he has done better than most players of his generation IMO. Maybe a few useless runs in between those great knocks would've helped with padding up his stats a bit.Laxman.
ATG when it comes to clutch games but a walking wicket against inswing.
Not on roads but more against incoming deliveries from pace bowlers. He did well against Australia because their natural bowling length is the good length, while on the other hand he struggled against Pakistan and England due to their bowling lengths being much fuller and they swung it back into the batsman.Having closely observed his entire career, Laxman is an excellent choice for this discussion. While there have been instances where he appeared to struggle on absolute roads, he has consistently done well in challenging conditions, especially when it mattered the most. In terms of clutch innings, he has done better than most players of his generation IMO. Maybe a few useless runs in between those great knocks would've helped with padding up his stats a bit.
I kinda thought Grimmet was considered the consensus 4th bestFor me spinners outside of Warne, Murali or O'Reilly. Those 3 for me are indisputably atg but what of: Tayfield, Laker, Verity, Underwood?
I've read that he was moderately successful vs the only decent team he played and cleaned up vs weaker RSA and WI teams.I kinda thought Grimmet was considered the consensus 4th best
Who were these innings against though? Imran, Hadlee, Botham. Not to mention what he managed against Lillee and Thompson to start off.Oh and I've talked about it at length before, but making the above post reminded me of Viv
For the last 10 years of his career he had ATVG stats, not ATG. Averaged 45 over this period.
Yet some people would say he's indisputably in the top 5 batsmen ever
It's kind of misleading since most of those last ten years he was still worldclass except the tailend.Oh and I've talked about it at length before, but making the above post reminded me of Viv
For the last 10 years of his career he had ATVG stats, not ATG. Averaged 45 over this period.
Yet some people would say he's indisputably in the top 5 batsmen ever
I'm not disputing he isn't ATG, but he's usually held up above Hutton, Hammond, Lara, Chappell etcWho were these innings against though? Imran, Hadlee, Botham. Not to mention what he managed against Lillee and Thompson to start off.
11 tons in his last 77 testsIt's kind of misleading since most of those last ten years he was still worldclass except the tailend.
i don’t think his batting stats are everything to base on how good he was. He had a lot of big time innings against the best of his era. He had a style and strike rate beyond the other batsmen of his era this batting without a helmet his entire career. He was a great captain and leader and also had a swagger about him that made everyone want to watch him bat. Plus all the players from his era rated him very highly.Oh and I've talked about it at length before, but making the above post reminded me of Viv
For the last 10 years of his career he had ATVG stats, not ATG. Averaged 45 over this period.
Yet some people would say he's indisputably in the top 5 batsmen ever
Sure but until exact tailend 89 onwards he was scoring a century virtually every series and was seen as the best bat in the world until 1988.11 tons in his last 77 tests
Mark Waugh scored a ton most series tooSure but until exact tailend 89 onwards he was scoring a century virtually every series and was seen as the best bat in the world until 1988.
I initially thought that especially when I was younger but I’m not sure I really have a consensus 4th anymore. He’s certainly amongst the discussion though.I kinda thought Grimmet was considered the consensus 4th best
Careful if you use logic or stats re: Viv not being top 5 you’ll be lynched.Mark Waugh scored a ton most series too
I just can't get around Viv being in that upper upper echelon he's placed in
Don't know how Aswin couldn't be included in this discussion. He's not as versatile as the wrist spinning trio, sure. However, home wins are wins, and don't think any spinner, with possible exception of Murali has been as unplayable as Ashwin at home.I initially thought that especially when I was younger but I’m not sure I really have a consensus 4th anymore. He’s certainly amongst the discussion though.