Pick one combo : Ambrose & Walsh vs Akram & Waqar

[DrWolverine]

Test cricket

 

[HouHsiaoHsien]

Wasim and Waqar were better at their peak especially

 

[subshakerz]

Walsh overall a minor weak link.

 

[kyear2]

Walsh overall a minor weak link.

This, but he was so much more consistent than Waqar.

 

[kyear2]

Ambrose > Wasim >> Waqar ~ Walsh.

 

[HouHsiaoHsien]

Waqar>Walsh(not by much tho). I find it a tough choice here, but Wasim+ Waqar(due to Waqar’s peak and cause their peaks coincided) were better at peak

 

[Coronis]

Waqar>Walsh(not by much tho). I find it a tough choice here, but Wasim+ Waqar(due to Waqar’s peak and cause their peaks coincided) were better at peak

A starc difference between the pair. Walsh’s peak came after Ambrose’s injury iirc.

 

[Johan]

Tampering amp Waqar > Ambrose > Wasim >> Walsh >> Waqar

 

[subshakerz]

Ambrose > Wasim >> Waqar ~ Walsh.

Waqar clearly more deadly than Walsh overall eve accounting for inconsistency.

 

[DrWolverine]

Peak : Waqar
Consistency : Walsh

Another case of peak vs consistency

 

[subshakerz]

I would take Waqar and Wasim for the first half of the 90s and Walsh and Ambrose for the latter half. Overall it's close.

 

[CodeOfWisden]

Depends on the ball and cameras.

 

[kyear2]

Depends on the ball and cameras.

Whistles quietly, lol

 

[Pap Finn Keighl]

Akram > Ambrose > Waqar > Walsh

 

[subshakerz]

Atherton picks Wasim and Waqar

 

[kyear2]

Atherton picks Wasim and Waqar

Did anyone get Ather's more than McGrath and Ambrose?

 

[DrWolverine]

Did anyone get Ather's more than McGrath and Ambrose?

McGrath : 19 in 34 innings
Ambrose : 17 in 47 innings
Walsh : 17 in 50 innings

 

[subshakerz]

Did anyone get Ather's more than McGrath and Ambrose?

So what? You think Tendulkar should consider Anderson the best he faced by that rule?

 

[kyear2]

McGrath : 19 in 34 innings
Ambrose : 17 in 47 innings
Walsh : 17 in 50 innings

What I thought.

 

[capt_Luffy]

@ankitj I have a feeling might switch