Well the technique can mess around with your idea of where off-stump istbf to Hughes I think his issue is less to do with his technique for most things apart from the short ball.
Just needs to learn to leave the ball a bit better but for the short ball he gets himself in a tangle far too easily.
Hard not to sympathise with Worcs tbh. Surely it's a lot easier to score 95 off 14 overs (and Lancs would have won with 84) than 259 off 40.Damn this, Worcs not been in a great run of form as of late and this was a pretty ample chance
I've always thought you should D/L with a margin of uncertainty, particularly in games that are so heavily abbreviated. If Lancashire were 120-0 or 60-4 off 14 overs then fair enough. But guessing so much when it's relatively small margins at such an early point is complete cobblers. Given it is a group game it makes sense to have it as a no result. Of course in cricket we don't bother with common sense. We are quite happy to use hugely complicated systems and then **** things up though.Hard not to sympathise with Worcs tbh. Surely it's a lot easier to score 95 off 14 overs (and Lancs would have won with 84) than 259 off 40.
Ultimately Worcs paid for subsiding as they did after Solanki's dismissal.
I would say those slower balls were Saj's influence.Attempts at a slower ball led to a couple of shockers from Shahzad there - only just landed them on the cut strip.
And Hughes is quite happy to have the ball angled away from him.
Good news. Ramps has returned to club cricket and been gunning it and my club is due to play him at the end of the month, so I'm hoping he's back in the Surrey first team then.Surrey and Yorkshire both playing two spinners today. Ramps and Rashid recalled.
Thought the same for some reason. Worrying signs.First thought when reading that was "But Ramps isn't a spinner."
Putting the internet down for a bit.
I was under the impression that D/L didn't kick in until 20 overs had been bowled anyway - at that point the comms usually say "we have a game" or something similar, if rain is threatening - but perhaps that's only in 50 overs games?I've always thought you should D/L with a margin of uncertainty, particularly in games that are so heavily abbreviated. If Lancashire were 120-0 or 60-4 off 14 overs then fair enough. But guessing so much when it's relatively small margins at such an early point is complete cobblers. Given it is a group game it makes sense to have it as a no result. Of course in cricket we don't bother with common sense. We are quite happy to use hugely complicated systems and then **** things up though.
Getting a bit fed up with our continued use of makeshift openers tbh - Jason Roy is not an opener, nor is Ramprakash, and nor for that matter are RHB or Davies. We've only had one specialist do it regularly since Butch retired, and even he (Brown) only played one full season. Trouble is that we have too many middle-order guys vieing for places (signing Rudolph hardly helped matters). Can only be a matter of time before Maynard gets a go, at which point his form will evaporate.Asked to open which must be the first time in decades and scored 8 which is pretty good for Ramps this season. Highest score so far has been 29 for Surrey’s second XI. KP in one game for Surrey scored more runs than Ramps has all season.
Surrey's flat track bullies been brutally exposed this season. Only right handed batsman, Tom Maynard and Jon Lewis average above 30 (minimum 150 runs scored).