Athlai
Not Terrible
I may love Bangers, but my hatred of Kayes is stronger.**** you
I may love Bangers, but my hatred of Kayes is stronger.**** you
Yes.Lyon's better than SOK isn't he?
Australia have a lot of things going for them this test which doesn't always happen together. Handscomb converting a start? Warner ton overseas in Asia? Lyon bowling fire? BD dropping a bunch of catches? Pat Cummins not breaking down?This test is going just as I expected. Bangladesh had a lot of things going for them in the last test which don't always happen together.
Eh I don't think that makes a huge difference does it. Kayes tends to be walking in pretty early anyways.Mominul needed to come at #3. Kayes himself said hes not comfortable at 3 though I think hes not comfortable anywhere.
All those things you're talking about are literally just one team playing better than another, not exactly what I think he meant by "things going for them".Australia have a lot of things going for them this test which doesn't always happen together. Handscomb converting a start? Warner ton overseas in Asia? Lyon bowling fire? BD dropping a bunch of catches? Pat Cummins not breaking down?
Likewise BD have had so much that usually works not work for them. Mehdi having a bad couple of spells, Fizz having a bad couple of spells, Tamim failing twice, Kayes 2.0 reverting to Kayes 1.0. And as PEWS pointed out earlier, they chronically drop catches and have bad captaincy.
Every team who wins a test does so because things go in their favour. If things don't go in your favour, you lose games. That's how cricket work. You can't have everything go wrong and still win. You usually don't have everything go right and still lose.
To act as though this Test is some sort of justification of BD not being a good side who only wins when things work in their favour is ridiculous. The whole premise is ridiculous to begin with.
BD played better in the first test and won, and Aus are playing better here and are well in front. That's it. Simple.
Yes, I am doing the quoted line. BD win only when things are in their favour. Australia is a much better side than BD and do not lose to BD unless all things go against them. BD is too reliant on Tamim and Shakib. In the first test, both of them fired together and amazingly awesome at that. Also, Smith is this generation's Don. It is rare for him to fail twice in a test.Australia have a lot of things going for them this test which doesn't always happen together. Handscomb converting a start? Warner ton overseas in Asia? Lyon bowling fire? BD dropping a bunch of catches? Pat Cummins not breaking down?
Likewise BD have had so much that usually works not work for them. Mehdi having a bad couple of spells, Fizz having a bad couple of spells, Tamim failing twice, Kayes 2.0 reverting to Kayes 1.0. And as PEWS pointed out earlier, they chronically drop catches and have bad captaincy.
Every team who wins a test does so because things go in their favour. If things don't go in your favour, you lose games. That's how cricket work. You can't have everything go wrong and still win. You usually don't have everything go right and still lose.
To act as though this Test is some sort of justification of BD not being a good side who only wins when things work in their favour is ridiculous. The whole premise is ridiculous to begin with.
BD played better in the first test and won, and Aus are playing better here and are well in front. That's it. Simple.
Moses should be back. Mushfiqur batting so low so he can keep is getting more ridiculous by the day, too - he has to bat top four. If he wants to have a go batting four and keeping (poorly) then fine, whatever, but he has to bat there. If he's not comfortable batting there while he's keeping then he absolutely shouldn't keep; he's **** at it anyway, and Bangladesh already have a specialist bat coming in at eight.Not sure what to do for the rest of the top order. Maybe bring back Mahmadullah tbh. We need some experienced heads in there.