• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Murali vs Barnes vs O’Reilly vs Warne

Who is the greatest test bowler?


  • Total voters
    17

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Barnes>Warne~Murali>O Reilly

kinda awkward to shove in a pacer like Barnes with two conventional spinners and a fast leggie like O Reilly though.

Anyway, Barnes is the greatest bowler of all time barring Glenn McGrath and Malcolm Marshall so he's number one, I think Warne and Murali are practically equals with Murali being better on slow turning wickets while Warne being better on hard bouncy wickets with them being equal on greentops and roads. Tiger is probably no lesser than the other three but I'm more comfortable with him being three than Warne or Murali considering how prolific they are.
 
Last edited:

Red_Ink_Squid

Global Moderator
Gun to the head I'd go Murali > O'Reilly > Warne > Barnes.

But they're all top 10 bowlers ever, I don't think there's a "wrong" order to rank them really.
 

peterhrt

State 12th Man
Is there even one single picture of the keeper standing back to Barnes?
Barnes started off as a fast bowler, modelling himself on Tom Richardson, before cutting his pace to suit conditions.

Cardus confirmed that his average pace was on the brisk side of medium and that he swung the new ball. Hobbs said that much of his success on South African matting was the result of abnormal bounce rather than sideways movement. As with Evans and Bedser, the keeper standing up made it more difficult for batsmen to get to the pitch of the ball. Bedser reckoned this contributed to catches in the outfield.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Not because they were too slow, but because they weren't good enough!
The referenced comment was that Barnes had more in common with Ambrose than Warne (if I'm remembering correctly)

Every video we've seen of Barnes is nothing more than what looks to be spin.

We can just agree to disagree.
 

Migara

International Coach
Barnes' average once adjustwd to tge eraia about 21.5.

So he is not heads and shoukders above Murali and O'Riely.

I don't think he was even a spin bowler. Most likely bowled leg rollers and off cutters with seam ups.
 

Top