Yep, just had a look now - 17 wickets at 6.64 (!) in the 2007-08 U19 World Cup. From memory I think he took 10-for against Auckland in a FC game as an 18-year-old too before he debuted.He had some great U19 performances right?
Yep, just had a look now - 17 wickets at 6.64 (!) in the 2007-08 U19 World Cup. From memory I think he took 10-for against Auckland in a FC game as an 18-year-old too before he debuted.He had some great U19 performances right?
I remember 1991 when you brought over to us a lad called Lara, who had a huge reputation, and then didn't pick him for any of the Tests - I wasn't alone by any means in wanting your frontline batsmen to pick up a few injuriesFor us, it was Kraigg Brathwaite— the kid had amassed 76 centuries in various levels of cricket before making his test debut.
Adrian Barath was another one—he was making lots of runs at a very young age.
And let’s not forget Rahkeem Cornwall.
Glass house, meet 11,000,000 M² meteoriteHB's Lara love is clear as day to anyone not being an obtuse prick looking for a scandal but I suppose that's where the issue lies.
can you give it a rest? this is like the dumbest feud. from what i gather you don't like trundler because he made a bad call and wanted mitchell starc dropped. boo ****ing hoo. go look at my earliest posts in the starc v boult thread if you want to see what a massively overrated hype job in test matches i correctly declared starc as early on before the worthless **** came good in tests a couple of years ago.Stunned Pucovski hasn't got a mention yet
Glass house, meet 11,000,000 M² meteorite
ErrrghhhWas Lara's debut that big a deal?
Sometimes it feels like his entire account is this. Pretty sure he's just inherently accidentally annoying though.Seemed like a deliberate attempt to annoy.
Not really iirc. Had a modest FC record and they were looking for a spinner for Sydney. I don't recall there being much hype about him at all tbh, but it was the tail end of the pace dominated era over here anyway. Far more hype about someone like McDermott when he debuted in 84 than there was with Warne, unless I've got the recollection arse about.Was there much hype when Warne made his debut?
Not a bad summary tbh, save you left me out of the top posters.you're all thoroughly mid-pack with magrat and ed on top as the best humans on the site and me, anderson propagandists and the 12 year old indian nationalists at the bottom.
Frankly I thought the kid was truly insipid before all that shite regarding Starc tbh. I find his desire to try and insert himself into absolutely every single thread utterly nauseating, pretty much the Peirs Morgan of CWcan you give it a rest? this is like the dumbest feud. from what i gather you don't like trundler because he made a bad call and wanted mitchell starc dropped. boo ****ing hoo. go look at my earliest posts in the starc v boult thread if you want to see what a massively overrated hype job in test matches i correctly declared starc as early on before the worthless **** came good in tests a couple of years ago.
trundler doesn't even make the bottom 15 crap members on here. you're all thoroughly mid-pack with magrat and ed on top as the best humans on the site and me, anderson propagandists and the 12 year old indian nationalists at the bottom. just chill bro.
Seemed like a deliberate attempt to annoy.
Ok this could be referring to nearly half the posters on here can we be more specificSometimes it feels like his entire account is this. Pretty sure he's just inherently accidentally annoying though.
Huh?Sometimes it feels like his entire account is this. Pretty sure he's just inherently accidentally annoying though.
Think he included you in the 12 year old Indian nationalists.Not a bad summary tbh, save you left me out of the top posters.
He's saying that you're not annoying on purpose. I believe it's a complimentHuh?
Rare gold, thisHe's saying that you're not annoying on purpose. I believe it's a compliment