Marnis labuschagne vs adam voges? Who win?He got 10 100s already and he has another 8 years of test cricket left in him so why cant he score at least 40 100s in test cricket and become the greatest ever Australian test batsman.
Ranking | Name | Tm | Batting Rating |
1 | Don Bradman | Aus | 951.4 |
2 | Marnus Labuschagne | Aus | 907.8 |
3 | Steven (SPD) Smith | Aus | 858.8 |
4 | Everton Weekes | WI | 836.8 |
5 | Len Hutton | Eng | 836.0 |
6 | Joe Root | Eng | 829.6 |
7 | Dudley Nourse | SA | 826.9 |
8 | Graeme Pollock | SA | 824.4 |
9 | Garry Sobers | WI | 821.5 |
10 | Jack Hobbs | Eng | 816.8 |
11 | Ken Barrington | Eng | 815.7 |
12 | Brian Lara | WI | 813.6 |
13 | Peter May | Eng | 812.2 |
14 | Herbert Sutcliffe | Eng | 809.1 |
15 | Kumar Sangakkara | SL | 806.2 |
Just think: he's probably less than half way through his Test career.Marnus currently has the second highest average ICC Batting Rating of all time.
http://www.lanefarm.plus.com/cricket/ratings/batting.htm
Ranking Name Tm Batting Rating 1 Don Bradman Aus 951.4 2 Marnus Labuschagne Aus 907.8 3 Steven (SPD) Smith Aus 858.8 4 Everton Weekes WI 836.8 5 Len Hutton Eng 836.0 6 Joe Root Eng 829.6 7 Dudley Nourse SA 826.9 8 Graeme Pollock SA 824.4 9 Garry Sobers WI 821.5 10 Jack Hobbs Eng 816.8 11 Ken Barrington Eng 815.7 12 Brian Lara WI 813.6 13 Peter May Eng 812.2 14 Herbert Sutcliffe Eng 809.1 15 Kumar Sangakkara SL 806.2
I see Travis Head is ahead (no pun intended) of Viv in this rating!??Marnus currently has the second highest average ICC Batting Rating of all time.
http://www.lanefarm.plus.com/cricket/ratings/batting.htm
Ranking Name Tm Batting Rating 1 Don Bradman Aus 951.4 2 Marnus Labuschagne Aus 907.8 3 Steven (SPD) Smith Aus 858.8 4 Everton Weekes WI 836.8 5 Len Hutton Eng 836.0 6 Joe Root Eng 829.6 7 Dudley Nourse SA 826.9 8 Graeme Pollock SA 824.4 9 Garry Sobers WI 821.5 10 Jack Hobbs Eng 816.8 11 Ken Barrington Eng 815.7 12 Brian Lara WI 813.6 13 Peter May Eng 812.2 14 Herbert Sutcliffe Eng 809.1 15 Kumar Sangakkara SL 806.2
Where have these ratings come from? Because they are not (mean) average ICC ratings. No one has an average ICC rating above 900, not even Bradman - due to the fact it takes every player a while to build their rating from scratch and that the first 20 innings or so are weighted lower.Marnus currently has the second highest average ICC Batting Rating of all time.
http://www.lanefarm.plus.com/cricket/ratings/batting.htm
Ranking Name Tm Batting Rating 1 Don Bradman Aus 951.4 2 Marnus Labuschagne Aus 907.8 3 Steven (SPD) Smith Aus 858.8 4 Everton Weekes WI 836.8 5 Len Hutton Eng 836.0 6 Joe Root Eng 829.6 7 Dudley Nourse SA 826.9 8 Graeme Pollock SA 824.4 9 Garry Sobers WI 821.5 10 Jack Hobbs Eng 816.8 11 Ken Barrington Eng 815.7 12 Brian Lara WI 813.6 13 Peter May Eng 812.2 14 Herbert Sutcliffe Eng 809.1 15 Kumar Sangakkara SL 806.2
Where have these ratings come from? Because they are not (mean) average ICC ratings. No one has an average ICC rating above 900, not even Bradman - due to the fact it takes every player a while to build their rating from scratch and that the first 20 innings or so are weighted lower.
Bradman's average rating from memory is 850-odd, which is still a long way ahead of everyone else.
Thanks. So they're his modified version of the ICC ratings, removing things like the early matches weighting and missed matched penalty and adding some of his own stuff to recalculate accordingly.
Still better than Bradman'sWhat up with Marnus one day record it appalling batting stats.