Yes!!!! And he was atleast serviceable outside of Pakistan. Qadir wad horrible outside Pakistan.Iqbal Qasim
Averaged lower then Abdul Qadir yet people still talk about Qadir but Qasim is hardly in any cricketing convo.
Yesss!! Again. Actually, Sir Frank averaged 50 from his very first test until his last. It's only in his last test that his average fell below 50. Probably the only below 50 averaging player I'd call a great (along with Inzamam and a few others). Great batsman, captain, and an even greater human being. And be bowled handy left seam as well.Sir Frank Worrell ...
Often lazily grouped together with the Three W's tag , you rarely see him in any all-time XI's even in West Indies all time test XI's he is often excluded , I appreciate he is from generation of cricketers that are long since past , but Sir Worrell was the perfect example of a gentleman cricketer ...He was a brilliant batsman with a average of nearly 50 and a handy left arm seamer with 2 test five-fors , his leadership was also world class ...I think in the last 20-30 years he isn't as talked as much as he used to be .
Yes Imran obsession with Qadir lost Pakistan a chance to win the historic 88 series in WestindiesYes!!!! And he was atleast serviceable outside of Pakistan. Qadir wad horrible outside Pakistan.
Qasim also had huge role in 1987 series victory in India.Yes Imran obsession with Qadir lost Pakistan a chance to win the historic 88 series in Westindies
Qasim would have won us the 3rd test.
Yes. Like Nurse. Sounds like he was savage at his best.On that note, Seymour Nurse too
Awesome test record relative to his reputation
Brian?Maybe because he overlapped with Bedser and then Trueman, but dear old George Statham never quite seems to get the props he's due.
I talk about him. It's one of my favourite 'Qadir was overrated' points.Iqbal Qasim
Averaged lower then Abdul Qadir yet people still talk about Qadir but Qasim is hardly in any cricketing convo.