PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Ignore longevity, which bowler is better at their peak ?
Harris at his best was absolutely phenomenal. Harris at his worst (early-mid South Australia days) was barely FC standardRyan Harris was as good as anyone on his day but "his day" was like 30 days total in his career
Ah the classic "if you take out his best few series his overall record isn't that good"Ryan Harris, at his peak, was an outstanding bowler. However, much of his reputation is based on two Ashes series - 2013 in England and 2013/14 at home. In those Tests he took 46 wickets @ 19.47 and this, plus a 2 Test series against SL when he took 11 wickets @ 14.55 are his career highlights.
In all he played in 10 series and those 3 series resulted in over 50% of his wickets. In the remaining 7 series in which he played (16 Tests) his 56 wickets came @ 28.63 - solid but not outstanding.
He did manage a long career. He spent most of playing Adelaide first grade because he was ****ing **** at the time.Ryan Harris was one of the best bowlers of his generation. It's a shame he didn't manage a long career.
Was still somewhat injury prone even when he was crap though tbfHe did manage a long career. He spent most of playing Adelaide first grade because he was ****ing **** at the time.
Maybe but compared to Ryan Harris's 3 series averaging under 20, Anderson has done it 19 times.Ah the classic "if you take out his best few series his overall record isn't that good"
I'd wager if you ignore Anderson's top 25% of series too his average would be a fair bit higher than 28
I'm pretty sure Anderson playing a lot more cricket than Ryan Harris isn't in dispute champMaybe but compared to Ryan Harris's 3 series averaging under 20, Anderson has done it 19 times.
Graham Manou disagreeslol this will be good. How much can we narrow "peak" down to?
Jimmy never bowled a ball as good as the Harris to Cook ball
So if that's his peak ball, then I guess the answer is Harris
Not even close budGraham Manou disagrees
ohNot even close bud
Yeah, Harris was too crap to even be picked let alone do well for most of his career. He's lucky he didn't play in this period because then he'd have a Suranga Lakmal record.He did manage a long career. He spent most of playing Adelaide first grade because he was ****ing **** at the time.
Literally pointed out every time to Flem when this topic comes up. It's like poetry.He did manage a long career. He spent most of playing Adelaide first grade because he was ****ing **** at the time.