• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jamaican Players left to trade

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eclipse

International Debutant
I am willing to Trade all 4 of these players for 1 established batsman with Fc and OD avrages over 40 or the best offer.

Batsman:
K. Semple FC bat 28.5 & OD bat 27. (also an economical bowler)
Spinner:
R. Cunningham FC sr 66 econ 32 (exellent economy) OD sr 41 econ 69.
Allrounder: (spinner)
N. Perry FC bat avrage 20 Sr 64 econ 39 OD bat avrage 18 sr 58 econ 64. (former West indian International)
Batsman:
D. Benard FC bat avrage 25 Od bat avrage 26.65.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
yeh it sucks, trading was heaps better last season when we were allowed to trade 4 for 1 and thing like that.
i hope the board brong that rule back in next season.
 

Umpire Money

State Vice-Captain
Eclipse none of those 4 players interest me you have to give me something to work with if you want mckenzie.
mckenzie is like 38 in 4d and 32(or something) in1d

better hurry lots of interest around him
 

aditya

U19 Vice-Captain
marc71178 said:
No, it was a lot worse, and will almost certainly NEVER come back in.
There were much more options and it was much more interesting and challenging.I also think it should be brought back next season.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
It made it a lot harder to administer and led to people getting rid of more than 6 players, which was clearly unfair in some cases.
It's been stated it was a one off, and this season will make it more even if one for one trades are maintained.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Marc stop being an idiot for 5 minutes and realise these decision arent yours, you dont run this game. gb said he will consider it. He will be online tomorrow, talk to him then.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
broncoman said:
Marc stop being an idiot for 5 minutes and realise these decision arent yours, you dont run this game. gb said he will consider it. He will be online tomorrow, talk to him then.
I may not run the game, but I am on the board, and as such have a say in the running of the game.

The rules were changed for a reason.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
marc71178 said:
I may not run the game, but I am on the board, and as such have a say in the running of the game.

The rules were changed for a reason.
Temporarily on the board
anyway you use to always suggest things when you werent temporarily on the board
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
broncoman said:
Temporarily on the board
anyway you use to always suggest things when you werent temporarily on the board
No Temporarily involved in there - it's permanent.

The only suggestions I can remember making have been implemented, and lead to me becoming a Permanent Board Member.

These current ones seem to moan about everything the board has discussed and implemented.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
marc71178 said:
No Temporarily involved in there - it's permanent.

The only suggestions I can remember making have been implemented, and lead to me becoming a Permanent Board Member.

These current ones seem to moan about everything the board has discussed and implemented.
Yes because theres a ******** on the board like you at the moment who cant get the decisions right.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Well, considering the board is democratic, any suggestions have to be passed by a majority - therefore you are calling other members of the board (or the board as a whole) a bunch of (8 letter long expletive) s.

Care to elaborate as to which members (other than me, because I obviously am whatever you think I am) are the aforementioned expletive?
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
well including you we know there are 6 members of the board.
GB
rich
eyes
bugs
lord
you

lord and gb are away so obviously not them. eyes has been away and taking no part in board meetings, bugs hasnt been around that much and not involved and we all know how much control you seem to have over rich.
that leaves just 1.
 

Rich2001

International Captain
As far as Iam aware I haven't changed or implimented anything from when GB left.... I only decided on a transfer date, which would mean that Marc holds the control over GB...

Come on though I didn't have either of you down as the sort that would cause agrugments...

Both of you can cool it or it will be James that sorts this out, Cricket Web doesn't accept langue like that and anyone that makes the forum look bad in general

Ok Iam going to close this thread as well, lets try an keep to the cricket.... if you have any problems then you know where to find me.... If you wish to continue the agruments then don't just start it in another thread take it to U2U's or e-mail.

Just to say sorry to the Jamaican manager, sorry I had to close your thread but I hope you can understand why, feel free to start another thread with your players left to trade..........
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top